Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Not All Randomized Control Trials Are the Same: Response.

The American journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Group-Sequential Designs With an Externally-Driven Change of Primary Endpoint.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

In Silico Clinical Trials in Drug Development: A Systematic Review.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2025
Same author

ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External beam radiotherapy combined with endorectal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer: A prospective multicentre trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2025
Same author

Systematic review and meta-analysis of intravenous iron therapy for patients with heart failure and iron deficiency.

Nature medicine·2025
Same author

Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose in Heart Failure With Iron Deficiency: The FAIR-HF2 DZHK05 Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A comparison of methods for adaptive treatment selection.

Tim Friede1, Nigel Stallard

  • 1Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV47AL, United Kingdom. t.friede@warwick.ac.uk

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|October 22, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Adaptive seamless Phase II/III designs combine drug development phases. A simulation study found the adaptive Dunnett test consistently outperformed the classical Dunnett test for treatment selection.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Pharmaceutical Research
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Traditional drug development involves distinct phases (I, II, III) with separate objectives.
  • Adaptive seamless designs integrate objectives of multiple phases into a single trial.
  • Adaptive seamless Phase II/III designs are gaining interest for efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare four methods for adaptive treatment selection in seamless Phase II/III trials.
  • To evaluate the performance of these methods in terms of statistical power.
  • To identify scenarios where specific adaptive approaches offer advantages.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation study comparing four adaptive treatment selection methods.
  • Methods included classical Dunnett test, adaptive Dunnett test (conditional error), combination test, and group-sequential framework.
  • Performance was assessed based on statistical power and other relevant metrics.

Main Results:

  • No single method universally dominated others in power, except for the adaptive Dunnett test.
  • The adaptive Dunnett test inherently outperformed the classical Dunnett test.
  • Specific scenarios were identified where certain methods showed superior performance.

Conclusions:

  • Adaptive seamless Phase II/III designs offer a promising approach to streamline drug development.
  • The adaptive Dunnett test provides a robust improvement over the classical Dunnett test.
  • Method selection for adaptive treatment selection should consider specific trial scenarios and desired statistical properties.