Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
Published on: November 10, 2010
General validity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry
P Christiaan Klink1, Raymond van Ee, Richard J A van Wezel
1Functional Neurobiology & Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. P.C.Klink@uu.nl
Abstract:
The mechanisms underlying conscious visual perception are often studied with either binocular rivalry or perceptual rivalry stimuli. Despite existing research into both types of rivalry, it remains unclear to what extent their underlying mechanisms involve common computational rules. Computational models of binocular rivalry mechanisms are generally tested against Levelt's four propositions, describing the psychophysical relation between stimulus strength and alternation dynamics in binocular rivalry. Here we use a bistable rotating structure-from-motion sphere, a generally studied form of perceptual rivalry, to demonstrate that Levelt's propositions also apply to the alternation dynamics of perceptual rivalry. Importantly, these findings suggest that bistability in structure-from-motion results from active cross-inhibition between neural populations with computational principles similar to those present in binocular rivalry. Thus, although the neural input to the computational mechanism of rivalry may stem from different cortical neurons and different cognitive levels the computational principles just prior to the production of visual awareness appear to be common to the two types of rivalry.
Related Concept Videos
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Perceptual Constancy
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Color Vision
Visual System
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

