Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a bonus...
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Triglyceride levels and all-cause mortality in patients with left main coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same author

Substance use and the value of control.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same author

Beyond analogy: Pragmatic constraints on metaphor production and comprehension.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Hierarchical abstraction drives human-like 3-D shape processing in deep learning models.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Threat discrimination of real-world social interactions in schizotypal traits.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

A megastudy of behavioral interventions to catalyze public, political, and financial climate advocacy.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Bayesian generic priors for causal learning.

Hongjing Lu1, Alan L Yuille, Mimi Liljeholm

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA. hongjing@ucla.edu

Psychological Review
|October 29, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a Bayesian causal learning model favoring sparse, strong causes. The model accurately predicts human judgments of causal strength and structure, outperforming other models.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Human causal learning involves inferring cause-effect relationships from observations.
  • Existing Bayesian models often lack explicit assumptions about the structure of causal systems.
  • Prior research suggests humans favor simpler explanations for observed phenomena.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a Bayesian model of causal learning incorporating generic priors.
  • To investigate how these priors influence judgments of causal strength and structure.
  • To compare the proposed model against alternative Bayesian and non-normative models.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a Bayesian model with generic priors favoring sparse and strong (SS) causes.
  • Utilized a causal generating function assuming independent unobservable causal influences.
  • Tested the model by fitting it to multiple experimental datasets with varied parameters.

Main Results:

  • The SS power model successfully accounted for human judgments of both causal strength and causal structure.
  • The model explained why causal power and effect base rates influence structure judgments more than sample size.
  • Compared to a Bayesian model without generic priors, the SS model showed improved data fit.

Conclusions:

  • Generic priors favoring sparse and strong causes are crucial for accurate Bayesian causal learning models.
  • The proposed SS power model provides a robust framework for understanding human causal inference.
  • The findings have broader implications for understanding human learning within a Bayesian framework.