Pulsed electrochemical detection of penicillins using three and four step waveforms

Aided by the construction of a custom potentiostat, a series of different PAD waveforms were compared to find the optimum detector for penicillin oxidation. The waveforms included standard 3-step direct and indirect PAD in addition to reverse-PAD and 4-step PAD. Two new waveforms, the indirect reverse-PAD and the 4-step indirect PAD were examined in the study. Under the solvent conditions of the study (0.01M acetate buffer, pH 4.6) the indirect waveforms yielded the best detectability for penicillin G while the reverse-PAD waveforms yielded the worst performance. The 4-step PAD methods did not improve detectability when compared to the 3-step types, but they did provide output peak profiles with better shapes and less tailing. Although indirect waveforms gave better detectability than direct detection in the 0.01M acetate buffer solution, the limits of detection for each were found to be differing functions of ionic strength. At higher acetate concentrations, direct PAD was more favorable than indirect detection.