Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
Creatinine determination in urine samples by batchwise kinetic procedure and flow injection analysis using the Jaffé
P Campins Falcó1, L A Tortajada Genaro, S Meseger Lloret
1Departament de Quimica Analitica, Facultad de Quimica Universitat de Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner 50, E46100-Burjassot, 46100 Valencia, Spain.
This study compares batchwise and flow injection methods for urine creatinine determination using the Jaffé reaction. The batchwise method offers improved accuracy and precision without blank correction, while the flow injection method is faster but requires albumin consideration.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Biochemistry
Background:
- The Jaffé reaction is a classical method for determining creatinine in urine.
- Accurate creatinine measurement is crucial for diagnosing kidney function and other health conditions.
- Existing methods may suffer from bias and imprecision, necessitating analytical improvements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the analytical characteristics of batchwise and flow injection (FI) methods for urine creatinine determination.
- To minimize bias error and enhance precision in creatinine measurements.
- To investigate the impact of albumin concentration on creatinine determination.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of batchwise and FI methods based on the Jaffé reaction.
- Evaluation of analytical signals, including absorbance increments at different time points.
- Assessment of method performance with varying albumin concentrations in urine samples.
Main Results:
- The batchwise method allows bias-free urine creatinine estimation using calibration graphs without blank measurement, with a linear range of 0.92-50 mg/l and a sample rate of 7/hour.
- The FI method offers a higher sample rate (approx. 20/hour) with a linear range of 30-100 mg/l but requires albumin correction for accuracy.
- Accurate creatinine results were achieved with both methods, confirming their diagnostic utility.
Conclusions:
- The batchwise Jaffé reaction method provides accurate and precise urine creatinine measurements, suitable for clinical diagnostics.
- The FI method is efficient for high-throughput analysis but necessitates specific calibration strategies when albumin levels are elevated.
- Both optimized methods are valuable tools for establishing urinary creatinine levels and aiding in disease diagnosis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Renal Drug Excretion: Effect of Urine pH, Flow Rate, and Drug pKa
The pKa of a drug,...
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
One-Compartment Open Model: Urinary Excretion Data and Determination of k
Determination of Renal Drug Clearance: Graphical and Midpoint Methods
The graphical method involves plotting the rate of drug excretion in urine against the plasma drug concentration. By analyzing the graph, the clearance can be calculated and obtained. Drugs rapidly excreted by the kidneys exhibit a...
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Serum Creatinine Concentration and Clearance

