Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Standard Precaution01:26

Standard Precaution

Standard precautions are the minimum infection control safeguards used while caring for all patients, irrespective of their disease condition. They help prevent the spread of common infectious microorganisms to healthcare workers, patients, and visitors in all healthcare settings.
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing01:10

PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing

The sequence of removing or doffing PPE starts with the gloves, as they are the most contaminated. Next is removal of the face shield or goggles, as they would interfere with removing other PPE. Then remove the gown, followed by the mask or respirator. Perform hand hygiene between steps if hands become contaminated and immediately after removing all PPE. Generally, the outside front and sleeves of the isolation gown, the goggles or the mask, the respirator, and the face shield are contaminated.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health Care Workers' Trust in Leadership: Why It Matters and How Leaders Can Build It.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2024
Same author

"We want what's best for patients." nurse leaders' attitudes about medical cannabis: A qualitative study.

International journal of nursing studies advances·2024
Same author

Social network strategy (SNS) for HIV testing: a new approach for identifying individuals with undiagnosed HIV infection in Tanzania.

AIDS care·2024
Same author

Physician Perspectives on Building Trust with Patients.

The Hastings Center report·2023
Same author

How Are Patients Who Legally Use Medical Marijuana Treated When Hospitalized?

Policy, politics & nursing practice·2023
Same author

Is patients' trust in clinicians related to patient-clinician racial/ethnic or gender concordance?

Patient education and counseling·2023
Same journal

Diminished Returns: The Hidden Health Costs of Upward Social Mobility for Black Americans.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

The Epidemiology, Prevention, and Control of Type 2 Diabetes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

Community-Based Participatory Research: Evolution and Significant Developments.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

Causal Inference in Health Disparities Research.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

The Health Implications of Fatherhood: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

Practice-Focused Research Based on Public Health Critical Race Praxis.

Annual review of public health·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
04:08

Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Published on: April 5, 2024

Cost-sharing: a blunt instrument.

Dahlia K Remler1, Jessica Greene

  • 1School of Public Affairs, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY, 10010, USA. Dahlia.Remler@baruch.cuny.edu

Annual Review of Public Health
|November 4, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Health care cost-sharing reduces some services but can harm access and financial protection. Judicious use is vital to avoid cutting essential, cost-effective care, especially for the chronically ill.

More Related Videos

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
10:34

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

The Third Channel-Assisted Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Combined with Contralateral Disc Herniation
06:26

The Third Channel-Assisted Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Combined with Contralateral Disc Herniation

Published on: November 17, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
04:08

Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Published on: April 5, 2024

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
10:34

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

The Third Channel-Assisted Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Combined with Contralateral Disc Herniation
06:26

The Third Channel-Assisted Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Combined with Contralateral Disc Herniation

Published on: November 17, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Health Services Research
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Cost-sharing, a health care cost-containment strategy, involves patients paying a portion of service costs.
  • While intended to curb non-cost-effective care, it may compromise insurance's financial protection and access benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review empirical evidence on the effects of health care cost-sharing.
  • To analyze impacts on utilization, expenditures, health outcomes, and adverse consequences.
  • To examine how these effects differ across care types, patient health status, and sociodemographics.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of empirical studies published since the mid-1980s.
  • Analysis of cost-sharing's impact on healthcare utilization and patient expenditures.
  • Assessment of effects on health status and identification of adverse consequences.

Main Results:

  • Some cost-sharing measures, like emergency department copayments, effectively reduce utilization without apparent harm.
  • Other forms of cost-sharing can decrease the use of valuable care, particularly maintenance medications for chronically ill patients.
  • Impacts of cost-sharing vary significantly based on the type of care, patient health status, and sociodemographic factors.

Conclusions:

  • Cost-sharing should be implemented cautiously, balancing cost containment with patient access and financial protection.
  • Care must be taken to avoid reducing utilization of highly cost-effective services, especially for vulnerable populations.
  • Policymakers should consider differential impacts when designing cost-sharing policies.