Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motor Units01:13

Motor Units

The motor unit is a fundamental component of the neuromuscular system and plays a crucial role in coordinating muscle contractions. It consists of a somatic motor neuron, which connects and controls multiple skeletal muscle fibers, forming a single functional segment. The axon of the motor neuron branches out and establishes synaptic connections known as neuromuscular junctions with individual muscle fibers within the motor unit.
Motor units come in different sizes, with smaller units...
Motor Units00:46

Motor Units

A motor unit consists of two main components: a single efferent motor neuron (i.e., a neuron that carries impulses away from the central nervous system) and all of the muscle fibers it innervates. The motor neuron may innervate multiple muscle fibers, which are single cells, but only one motor neuron innervates a single muscle fiber.
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Indirect Motor Pathways01:22

Indirect Motor Pathways

The indirect motor or extrapyramidal pathways originate in the brainstem, the lower portion of the brain that connects it to the spinal cord. They consist of several distinct tracts, each with specialized functions. The four main tracts of the indirect motor pathways are the vestibulospinal tract, the reticulospinal tract, the tectospinal tract, and the rubrospinal tract.
The vestibulospinal tract originates in the vestibular nuclei of the brainstem. The vestibular system detects changes in...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Commentary on progressive verbal apraxia of reading.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Daytime sleep following observational practice does not enhance a visual-spatial and a motor representation.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

An Imaging-Guided Neural Model Explains Lexical Stress Alteration in Acquired Apraxia of Speech.

Human brain mapping·2025
Same author

One-Year Outcomes of the MODULAR ATP Trial: A Novel Leadless Pacemaker in Wireless Communication With a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology·2025
Same author

Connectivity between supplementary motor complex and primary motor cortex: a dual-coil paired-pulse TMS study.

Frontiers in neurology·2025
Same author

Application of bilateral tDCS over left and right M1 produces asymmetric training and retention effects when learning a rhythmic bimanual task.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

Motor programming when sequencing multiple elements of the same duration.

Curt E Magnuson1, Donald A Robin, David L Wright

  • 1Human Performance Laboratories, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4243, USA.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|November 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Motor programming involves two processes: internal organization (INT) and sequential ordering (SEQ). Findings suggest INT independently organizes each element within a movement sequence, impacting processing demands.

More Related Videos

Magnetic Adjustment of Afterload in Engineered Heart Tissues
09:40

Magnetic Adjustment of Afterload in Engineered Heart Tissues

Published on: May 5, 2020

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

Magnetic Adjustment of Afterload in Engineered Heart Tissues
09:40

Magnetic Adjustment of Afterload in Engineered Heart Tissues

Published on: May 5, 2020

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Motor programming models explain how the brain plans and executes movements.
  • Two key processes are internal organization (INT) and sequential ordering (SEQ).
  • Understanding the processing demands of these independent processes is crucial for refining motor control theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the processing demands of independent motor programming processes.
  • To determine if internal organization (INT) costs in sequences arise from independent element planning or a multiplier process.
  • To elaborate the two-process account of motor programming based on experimental findings.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments utilized a self-select paradigm to examine motor programming.
  • Experiment 1: Compared processing demands for single key presses versus 4-key sequences of identical duration.
  • Experiment 2: Assessed INT costs in single key presses versus 2- or 3-key sequences of identical duration.

Main Results:

  • Implementing both INT and SEQ processes was more time-consuming for key-pressing sequences than single presses.
  • Findings indicated that INT is involved in the independent organization of each element within a sequence.
  • The results support the notion of independent planning for each element in motor sequences.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides evidence for the independent organizational role of INT in motor programming.
  • Results suggest an elaboration of the two-process model of motor programming.
  • The findings align with recent research on sequence learning and motor control.