Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026
Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Occlusal indexes as judged by subjective opinions
1Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA. aarruda@umich.edu
Introduction:
An orthodontic index is validated by comparing its scores with a gold standard, commonly the consensus opinion of a group of experienced orthodontists. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate contemporary occlusal indexes against the subjective opinions of people with varying levels of dental knowledge.
Methods:
Randomly selected orthodontic study models (n = 25) with full permanent dentitions were scored according to the peer assessment rating (PAR) index, the index of complexity, outcome, and need (ICON), and the occlusal index (OI). The models were also scored according to the subjective opinion of orthodontists (n = 10), general dentists (n = 10), and social workers (n = 10) by using a Q-sort assessment.
Results:
High correlation coefficients were found between the panelists and the occlusal indexes. The average correlation was about 0.8.
Conclusions:
Regardless of background and clinical experience, people with various levels of dental knowledge have similar opinions when quantifying relationships of teeth and dental arches.
