Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leveraging Commercially Available Protein Assays as Biomarkers for Lung Cancer.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Lnc5q21.2, a novel long intergenic RNA, sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to ATR inhibitor by activating Wnt pathway.

Journal of translational internal medicine·2025
Same author

Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial of Sulforaphane in Former Smokers at High Risk for Lung Cancer.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2025
Same author

Multiplex digital profiling of DNA methylation heterogeneity for sensitive and cost-effective cancer detection in low-volume liquid biopsies.

Science advances·2024
Same author

Brief Report: Phase II Clinical Trial of Atezolizumab in Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients Previously Treated With PD-1-Directed Therapy.

Clinical lung cancer·2024
Same author

Neighborhood-level deprivation and survival in lung cancer.

BMC cancer·2024
Same journal

Nanotechnology-Stem Cell Strategies in 3D Glioblastoma Organoid: Targeting Glioma Stem Cells Within a Complex Tumor Microenvironment.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Mapping the 3D Chromosome Organization of a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster by Capture Hi-C (CHi-C).

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Mapping the 3D Chromosome Organization of Streptomyces by Hi-C.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

CUT&Tag Epigenomic Profiling of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Rhizobium rhizogenes-Mediated Hairy Root Transformation Protocol for Lotus japonicus and Other Legumes.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Characterization of Bioactive Saponins from Sea Cucumbers.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Methylation-specific PCR.

Julien D F Licchesi1, James G Herman

  • 1Cancer Biology Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|November 7, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) detects DNA promoter hypermethylation. Nested-MSP (MN-MSP) improves detection sensitivity for low-quality DNA samples.

More Related Videos

Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation
21:24

Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation

Published on: January 2, 2009

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain
13:11

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Published on: July 12, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation
21:24

Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation

Published on: January 2, 2009

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain
13:11

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Published on: July 12, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Epigenetics
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Promoter hypermethylation of CpG islands is a significant epigenetic alteration in various cancers.
  • Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) is a widely used technique for detecting DNA methylation.
  • Standard MSP has limitations with low-quality or low-quantity DNA samples, such as those from paraffin-embedded tissues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the principles and applications of Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP).
  • To introduce Nested-MSP (MN-MSP) as an enhanced method for detecting DNA methylation.
  • To highlight the importance of primer design and protocol optimization for accurate methylation analysis.

Main Methods:

  • DNA is treated with sodium bisulfite, converting unmethylated cytosines to uracils while retaining methylated cytosines.
  • Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) uses primers specific to either methylated or unmethylated alleles.
  • Nested-MSP (MN-MSP) employs an initial methylation-unbiased amplification round followed by conventional MSP, enhancing sensitivity.

Main Results:

  • MSP effectively detects promoter hypermethylation in cell lines and fresh/frozen tissues.
  • MN-MSP demonstrates improved performance with challenging samples, including paraffin-embedded specimens with limited DNA.
  • The accuracy of both MSP and MN-MSP is critically dependent on meticulous primer design and protocol execution.

Conclusions:

  • MSP and MN-MSP are valuable, accessible techniques for analyzing DNA methylation patterns in molecular biology labs.
  • MN-MSP offers a significant advantage for analyzing clinical samples with compromised DNA integrity.
  • Careful optimization of MSP primer design and experimental procedures is essential for reliable promoter methylation status determination.