Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in untreated, localized prostate cancer: PSA velocity vs PSA doubling time
Michael K Ng1, Nicholas Van As, Karen Thomas
1Academic Unit Urology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK. michael.ng@petermac.org
Objectives:
To compare the accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity (PSAV) vs PSA doubling time (DT) for predicting the repeat biopsy results in men with localized prostate cancer on active surveillance (AS), as the utility of PSAV vs PSADT in untreated prostate cancer has not been well studied.
Patients And Methods:
Eligible patients had favourable-risk localized prostate cancer (T1/2a, PSA level
Results:
In all, 199 patients were assessable; the median PSAV and PSADT were 0.71 ng/mL/year and 5.29 years, respectively. Fifty-three patients (27%) had adverse histology on repeat biopsy. On univariate analyses, PSAV (P < 0.001) and PSADT (P = 0.019) were associated with adverse histology. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting adverse histology was 0.70 and 0.63 for PSAV and PSADT, respectively. The mean difference was 0.07 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.12; P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
PSAV is more accurate than PSADT for predicting adverse histology on repeat biopsies. These data suggest that PSAV should be used in preference to PSADT to describe PSA kinetics in untreated, localized prostate cancer.

