Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Random Variables

Random Variables

A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random Sampling Method

Random Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Primary prevention of Parkinson's disease: proceedings, the 8C's and a position statement from the Parkinson's disease prevention think tank.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026

Same author

Outcomes of Density-Targeted Supplemental Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening by Breast Cancer Risk: Long-Term Health and Economic Considerations.

Annals of internal medicine·2026

Same author

Five-Year Absolute Risk-Based and Age-Based Breast Cancer Screening in the US.

JAMA network open·2026

Same author

Assessing differences in country-level estimates of maternal mortality: a comparison of GMatH, UN, and GBD model results for 2020.

EClinicalMedicine·2025

Same author

Medical Imaging and Pediatric and Adolescent Hematologic Cancer Risk.

The New England journal of medicine·2025

Same author

Quantifying and Contextualizing Radiation Doses in Common Pediatric Medical Imaging Examinations.

Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Sealable Femtoliter Chamber Arrays for Cell-free Biology

Sealable Femtoliter Chamber Arrays for Cell-free Biology

Published on: March 11, 2015

Keeping the noise down: common random numbers for disease simulation modeling.

Natasha K Stout¹, Sue J Goldie

¹Program in Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA. nstout@hsph.harvard.edu

Health Care Management Science

|November 13, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Common random numbers improve disease simulation efficiency and enable counterfactual analyses by synchronizing random numbers across model runs. This technique enhances comparisons of preventive and treatment strategies in epidemiological models.

More Related Videos

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy

Published on: April 27, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Sealable Femtoliter Chamber Arrays for Cell-free Biology

Sealable Femtoliter Chamber Arrays for Cell-free Biology

Published on: March 11, 2015

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy

Published on: April 27, 2021

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Computational Biology
Health Decision Analysis

Background:

Disease simulation models are crucial for evaluating public health interventions.
Increasing model complexity necessitates advanced computational techniques.
Variance reduction methods improve efficiency and reduce noise in simulations.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and demonstrate the application of common random numbers (CRN) in individual-level disease simulation.
To highlight CRN's utility in enhancing computational efficiency and enabling counterfactual analyses.
To illustrate CRN's use in a breast cancer epidemiology model.

Main Methods:

Utilizing synchronized random numbers across multiple simulation runs.
Inducing correlation in model outputs to facilitate statistical comparisons.
Simulating identical individuals across different model scenarios.

Main Results:

Demonstrated improved computational efficiency in individual-level simulations.
Enabled direct computation of statistics at the individual level for counterfactual-like analyses.
Successfully applied CRN in a breast cancer epidemiological model.

Conclusions:

Common random numbers are an effective variance reduction technique for complex disease simulations.
CRN facilitates robust comparative effectiveness research and policy analysis.
This method enhances the utility of individual-level simulation models in public health.