Comparison of current density viability imaging at rest with FDG-PET in patients after myocardial infarction

M Goernig1, J Haueisen, J Schreiber

  • 1Clinic of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Matthias.Goernig@med.uni-jena.de

Insights

Current density (CD) imaging shows potential for assessing myocardial viability in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients post-infarction. However, current methods require further development for accurate scar tissue and viable myocardium differentiation.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Assessing myocardial viability is crucial for managing coronary artery disease (CAD) patients post-myocardial infarction.
  • Current diagnostic methods face challenges in accurately differentiating viable from non-viable heart tissue.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare novel three-dimensional current density (CD) imaging algorithms with 18-F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for evaluating myocardial viability.
  • To assess the correlation between CD activity and metabolic activity (FDG-PET uptake) in myocardial segments.

Main Methods:

  • Magnetic field mapping was used to obtain high-resolution data for CD imaging algorithms.
  • Six different algorithms were employed to solve the inverse problem for CD reconstruction in the left ventricle.
  • Myocardial viability was assessed using FDG-PET, with <45% uptake defining non-viable segments.

Main Results:

  • A significant correlation between CD and FDG-PET was observed in 5 out of 9 patients.
  • Three patients showed no correlation, and one exhibited a negative correlation.
  • All six CD reconstruction methods yielded similar results, with low CD magnitude in scar segments and some viable segments.

Conclusions:

  • Current density imaging holds promise for assessing myocardial viability but requires refinement.
  • Further advancements in vector measurement, stress testing, and mathematical methodologies are needed to improve accuracy.
  • The study highlights limitations in current CD imaging for distinguishing scar tissue from metabolically active but electrically impaired myocardium.

Related Concept Videos