Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization02:07

FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization

Fluorescence in situ hybridization, or FISH, was developed in the early 1980s and has quickly become one of the most widely used techniques in cytogenetics. Labeled probes are used to bind complementary DNA or RNA sequences on a chromosome or in a region within a cell. Earlier, the probes could only be obtained by cloning or reverse transcription of a DNA template. Currently, the probe oligonucleotides can be synthesized synthetically. Additionally, with the advancement of optical techniques,...
DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
Karyotyping01:17

Karyotyping

Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insulin Resistance: Hepatic Molecular Switches Gone Wrong?: Foxa2 Regulates Lipid Metabolism and Ketogenesis in the Liver during Fasting and in Diabetes. Nature 432: 1027-1032, 2004.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2023
Same author

The long-term impact of receiving incidental findings on parents undergoing genome-wide sequencing.

Journal of genetic counseling·2022
Same author

Long term outcomes of biomaterial-mediated repair of focal cartilage defects in a large animal model.

European cells & materials·2021
Same author

Assessing Shared Decision-Making Clinical Behaviors Among Genetic Counsellors.

Journal of genetic counseling·2018
Same author

Creation of an international registry to support discovery in schwannomatosis.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2016
Same author

Leptin receptor mutations in 129 db (3J)/db(3.J) mice and NIH fa (cp)/fa(cp) rats.

Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
07:34

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis

Published on: February 23, 2011

High-resolution array genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis.

J M Friedman1

  • 1Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, and Medical Genetics Research Unit, Child and Family Research Institute, Children's and Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. frid@interchange.ubc.ca

Prenatal Diagnosis
|November 15, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Array genomic hybridization (AGH) detects smaller chromosomal changes than conventional methods, identifying more fetal genomic imbalances. However, uncertain results and unknown risks limit its current prenatal diagnostic use.

More Related Videos

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
16:37

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
07:34

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis

Published on: February 23, 2011

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
16:37

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Prenatal Diagnostics
  • Genomic Medicine

Background:

  • Conventional cytogenetic methods have limitations in detecting small chromosomal abnormalities.
  • Genomic imbalances are a significant cause of birth defects and developmental disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of Array Genomic Hybridization (AGH) as a prenatal test for fetal genomic imbalance.
  • To compare the diagnostic yield of AGH with conventional cytogenetic analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Genome-wide AGH was employed to detect chromosomal gains or losses.
  • Comparison of AGH findings with conventional cytogenetic analysis in prenatal settings.

Main Results:

  • AGH can detect chromosomal changes 100 times smaller than conventional methods.
  • AGH identifies fetal genomic imbalances at least twice as frequently as conventional analysis.
  • AGH testing yields a higher proportion of results with uncertain clinical significance.

Conclusions:

  • AGH offers a more sensitive and frequent detection of fetal genomic imbalances prenatally.
  • The clinical significance of many AGH findings (CNVs) is not well-established, complicating patient counseling.
  • Current use of AGH for prenatal diagnosis should be restricted to high-risk pregnancies or clinical trials due to unknown risks and benefits.