Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Should the aortic valve be replaced in patients with mild aortic stenosis admitted for coronary surgery?
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany. andreas.boening@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de
Insights
For patients needing both coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR), performing them together is recommended. This combined approach avoids a second surgery, reducing overall risks for mild to moderate aortic stenosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- The optimal management of aortic valve stenosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting remains a subject of debate.
- Mild aortic stenosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) presents a clinical dilemma regarding aortic valve replacement (AVR).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of redo aortic valve replacement (AVR) after prior CABG versus combined AVR and CABG.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of simultaneous AVR and CABG compared to staged procedures.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis comparing 38 patients who underwent redo AVR after CABG with 202 patients who had combined AVR and CABG.
- Propensity-score matching was employed to minimize confounding variables between the two groups.
Main Results:
- Both groups demonstrated similar 30-day survival rates (94.7%).
- One- and 5-year survival rates were comparable between the redo AVR group (94.7%, 83.8%) and the combined AVR + CABG group (94.7%, 86.9%).
- No statistically significant differences in perioperative mortality or morbidity were observed between the groups, even after propensity score analysis.
Conclusions:
- Combined AVR and CABG is advisable for patients with coronary artery disease and mild to moderate aortic stenosis.
- Performing a single, combined procedure reduces the need for patients to undergo surgery twice, thereby mitigating associated risks.
Background:
The question whether the aortic valve in patients with mild aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) should be replaced or left alone is still controversial.
Methods:
Between 01/1995 and 03/2004, 38 patients (30 male, 8 female, mean age 70.9 +/- 7.8 years) required redo AVR 7.1 +/- 4.8 years after primary CABG, while 202 patients (125 male, 77 female, mean age 72.7 +/- 7.8 years) underwent combined AVR and CABG (1.9 +/- 0.8 grafts/patient). To evaluate the different approaches, the data of the redo-AVR group were compared with the data of a propensity-score matched group of AVR + CABG patients.
Results:
All patients survived the procedure; the 30-day survival was 94.7 % in both groups. The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 94.7 % and 83.8 % in the AVR after CABG group, and 94.7 % and 86.9 % in the AVR + CABG group, respectively. The late mortality was 28.9 % in the AVR after CABG and 25 % in the AVR + CABG group. Statistically, significant differences regarding perioperative mortality and morbidity could not be detected, neither with nor without propensity score analysis.
Conclusion:
Combined AVR and CABG in patients with coronary artery disease and mild to moderate aortic stenosis seems advisable in an institution with an equally low perioperative risk for both procedures, because the patient will need only one surgical procedure instead of undergoing surgery with all the associated risks twice.
More Related Videos
12:17Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery (ALCAPA)
Published on: April 24, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management