Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Murine Model of Group B Streptococcus Vaginal Colonization
Published on: November 16, 2016
Group B Streptococcus colonization in pregnancy: prevalence and prevention strategies of neonatal sepsis
Alma-Verena Rausch1, Ariane Gross, Sara Droz
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland.
Insights
Group B streptococci (GBS) colonization affects 21% of pregnant women. For preventing neonatal GBS sepsis, a screening-based approach is more cost-effective than a risk-based strategy.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Neonatal Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Early onset neonatal sepsis caused by Group B streptococci (GBS) leads to significant newborn morbidity and mortality.
- Optimal prevention strategies for GBS sepsis are debated and depend on GBS colonization prevalence and sepsis incidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of different GBS sepsis prevention strategies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1316 pregnant women's anogenital GBS colonization via selective cultures.
- Assessment of maternal intrapartum risk factors.
- Estimation of direct costs for risk-based, screening-based, and combined prevention strategies.
Main Results:
- GBS colonization prevalence was 21% among the studied pregnant women.
- Maternal intrapartum risk factors were present in 37% of cases.
- Estimated direct costs per 1000 live births: risk-based (18,500 CHF), screening-based (50,110 CHF), combined (43,495 CHF).
Conclusions:
- Given the 21% GBS colonization rate and intrapartum risk profile, a screening-based prevention strategy appears more effective than a risk-based approach for neonatal GBS sepsis.
Abstract:
Early onset neonatal sepsis due to Group B streptococci (GBS) is responsible for severe morbidity and mortality of newborns. While different preventive strategies to identify women at risk are being recommended, the optimal strategy depends on the incidence of GBS-sepsis and on the prevalence of anogenital GBS colonization. We therefore aimed to assess the Group B streptococci prevalence and its consequences on different prevention strategies. We analyzed 1316 pregnant women between March 2005 and September 2006 at our institution. The prevalence of GBS colonization was determined by selective cultures of anogenital smears. The presence of risk factors was analyzed. In addition, the direct costs of screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis were estimated for different preventive strategies. The prevalence of GBS colonization was 21%. Any maternal intrapartum risk factor was present in 37%. The direct costs of different prevention strategies have been estimated as follows: risk-based: 18,500 CHF/1000 live births, screening-based: 50,110 CHF/1000 live births, combined screening- and risk-based: 43,495/1000 live births. Strategies to prevent GBS-sepsis in newborn are necessary. With our colonization prevalence of 21%, and the intrapartum risk profile of women, the screening-based approach seems to be superior as compared to a risk-based approach.
Related Concept Videos
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Development of Human Microbiota
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
Streptococcal Pharyngitis
Microbiota Modulation by Antibiotics
