Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Aspects in post-orthodontic removal of Orthosystem implants
Grognard Nicolas1, Vande Vannet Bart
1nicolas.grognard.kabinet@skynet.be
Objectives:
Problems encountered in the removal of a temporary anchorage device, such as the Orthosystems implant, specially designed for orthodontic anchorage purposes after insertion at the palatal side of the maxilla, are presented and discussed.
Material And Methods:
The removal of these osseo-integrated implants was originally described to be executed by means of bone cutting around the implant with a trephine explanation burr. However, situations can be encountered in which the orthodontic tooth movement resulted in close contact between the implant and neighbouring teeth or the nasal cavity.
Results:
Trephine burr bone cutting around the implant can thereby lead to damage of the adjacent tooth with subsequent endodontic problems or perforation of the nasal cavity. In these cases, simple untightening by counterclockwise torque or if unsuccessful, removal of the transmucosal part of the fixture allowing creeping mucosal covering of the implant, should be considered. Furthermore, generation of CT-scan images performed after completion of active orthodontic therapy, with retraction of the upper anterior teeth, seems to be justified and indicated for planning the appropriate removal procedure.
Conclusion:
Retrospectively, the use of the longer version of the Orthosystems implant (6 mm in length) seems to be obsolete when para-median locations are chosen. Three cases are presented to illustrate these problems.

