Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Development and implementation of the IMRA multiplatform Foundations in Robotic Surgery online learning curriculum.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026

Same author

Implantable pelvic neurostimulators to restore erectile function: from concept to practice.

Nature reviews. Urology·2026

Same author

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Is It Really Necessary? A Multicentric Longitudinal Study Assessing Oncological Outcomes in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection vs Radical Prostatectomy Only.

The Journal of urology·2025

Same author

The Germline and Somatic Origins of Prostate Cancer Heterogeneity.

Cancer discovery·2025

Same author

Five-year outcomes of fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer from the TRANSFORM phase II trial.

International journal of cancer·2024

Same author

Genomic evolution shapes prostate cancer disease type.

Cell genomics·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Declan G Murphy¹, Benjamin J Challacombe, Anthony J Costello

¹The Urology Centre, Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, UK. decmurphy@doctors.net.uk

Asian Journal of Andrology

|December 4, 2008

Summary

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is feasible and safe, with oncological and functional outcomes comparable to traditional open surgery. Despite initial controversy and lack of level I evidence, RALRP shows promising results for prostate cancer treatment.

More Related Videos

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

Area of Science:

Urology
Surgical Technology
Oncology

Background:

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) utilizes the da Vinci surgical system, a costly technology.
The procedure, introduced in 2000, has faced criticism due to a perceived lack of supporting evidence.
Despite this, extensive patient studies indicate feasibility, safety, and low morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the current status of RALRP.
To evaluate perioperative data, complications, oncologic outcomes, and functional outcomes of RALRP.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature and patient data on RALRP.
Analysis of perioperative metrics, complication rates, oncologic results, and functional outcomes.
Comparison of robotic approach with traditional open radical prostatectomy.

Main Results:

RALRP is confirmed as a feasible and safe procedure with low morbidity.
Longer-term oncological data suggest outcomes are at least equivalent to open radical prostatectomy.
Functional outcomes appear satisfactory, though further randomized controlled trials are needed.

Conclusions:

RALRP is a viable surgical option for radical prostatectomy.
The procedure demonstrates comparable oncological efficacy and satisfactory functional results to open surgery.
Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is warranted to solidify evidence.