Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trends and current spectrum of contact allergy in Central Europe: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2007-2018.

The British journal of dermatology·2020
Same author

The Garment Protection Factor: further advances in labelling sun-protective clothing.

The British journal of dermatology·2018
Same author

Memorandum "Open Metadata". Open Access to Documentation Forms and Item Catalogs in Healthcare.

Methods of information in medicine·2015
Same author

The evolution of boosting algorithms. From machine learning to statistical modelling.

Methods of information in medicine·2014
Same author

Extending statistical boosting. An overview of recent methodological developments.

Methods of information in medicine·2014
Same author

Risk factors of polysensitization to contact allergens.

The British journal of dermatology·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Point and interval estimation of partial attributable risks from case-control data using the R-package 'pARccs'.

C Rämsch1, A B Pfahlberg, O Gefeller

  • 1Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. Christiane.Raemsch@imbe.med.uni-erlangen.de

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
|December 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces partial attributable risk (PAR) for multifactorial disease analysis. The R-package 'pARccs' provides tools for estimating PAR from case-control data, aiding epidemiologic research.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Attributable risk (AR) traditionally measures population-level disease risk from single exposures.
  • Increasingly, AR is applied to multifactorial situations requiring partitioning of combined exposure impacts.
  • Estimating factor-specific contributions in complex exposure scenarios is crucial for public health interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss point and interval estimation methods for partial attributable risk (PAR).
  • To introduce 'pARccs', a novel R-package for calculating PAR from case-control data.
  • To illustrate the application of PAR and 'pARccs' in a melanoma risk factor study.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized non-parametric bootstrap with stratified resampling for estimation.
  • Employed percentile and BC(a) methods for confidence interval computation.
  • Developed the 'pARccs' R-package for comprehensive PAR analysis.

Main Results:

  • The 'pARccs' package enables accurate point and interval estimation of PAR.
  • Demonstrated the utility of PAR and 'pARccs' using a melanoma case-control study example.
  • Provided insights into practical application and limitations for epidemiologic research.

Conclusions:

  • Partial attributable risk (PAR) is a valuable extension of AR for multifactorial disease analysis.
  • 'pARccs' offers a robust software solution for estimating PAR in case-control studies.
  • The methods and software facilitate a deeper understanding of complex exposure-disease relationships.