Related Experiment Videos

Patching vs atropine to treat amblyopia in children aged 7 to 12 years: a randomized trial

Mitchell M Scheiman1, Richard W Hertle, Raymond T Kraker

  • 1Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL 33647, USA. pedig@jaeb.org

Insights

Patching and atropine eyedrops showed similar effectiveness in treating moderate amblyopia in children aged 7-12. Both treatments improved visual acuity, with about 1 in 5 achieving 20/25 vision.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric Medicine
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Amblyopia, or "lazy eye," affects visual development in children.
  • Current treatments include patching and atropine eyedrops.
  • This study evaluated these treatments in older children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of patching versus atropine eyedrops for moderate amblyopia.
  • To assess treatment outcomes in children aged 7 to 12 years.
  • To determine if atropine is non-inferior to patching.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, multicenter clinical trial.
  • 193 children with amblyopia were assigned to either weekend atropine or 2-hour daily patching.
  • Visual acuity was assessed at 17 weeks using a standardized protocol.

Main Results:

  • Both atropine and patching groups showed similar average visual acuity improvements (7.6 vs. 8.6 letters).
  • The difference between groups met the criteria for equivalence.
  • Approximately 17% of the atropine group and 24% of the patching group achieved 20/25 or better vision.

Conclusions:

  • Patching and atropine eyedrops yield comparable results for moderate amblyopia in children aged 7-12.
  • Both treatments are effective in improving visual acuity.
  • About one-fifth of children achieved good visual outcomes with either method.
Abstract