Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Lampbrush Chromosomes01:51

Lampbrush Chromosomes

In 1882, Flemming observed lampbrush chromosomes (LBC) in salamander eggs. Later in 1892, Rückert observed LBCs in shark egg cells and coined the term "lampbrush chromosomes" because they looked like brushes used to clean kerosene lamps.
LBCs are made up of two pairs of conjugating homologous chromatids. Each chromatid consists of alternatively positioned regions of condensed-inactive chromatin and loosely placed-active side loops, which can be contracted and extended. The loops resemble the...
Hybrid Zones02:29

Hybrid Zones

Hybrid zones are narrow regions where two closely related species interact, mate, and produce hybrids. Relative to either parent species, hybrids may possess distinct phenotypic or genetic differences that impact their survival and reproductive success. The genetic variances introduced by hybridization influence species diversity and speciation processes within the hybrid zone.Gene flow and natural selection are evolutionary mechanisms that shape the outcome of a hybrid zone. Gene flow...
Genetics of Speciation02:16

Genetics of Speciation

Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.The genetics of speciation involves the different traits or isolating mechanisms preventing gene exchange, leading to reproductive isolation. Reproductive isolation can be due to reproductive barriers that have effects either before or after the formation of a zygote. Pre-zygotic mechanisms prevent fertilization from occurring, and post-zygotic mechanisms...
Fixed Action Patterns01:06

Fixed Action Patterns

A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.The structures that arise from convergent evolution are called analogous structures. They are similar in function even if they are dissimilar in structure. Further, structures can be analogous while also...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of population genetic patterns in two widespread freshwater mussels with contrasting life histories in western North America.

Molecular ecology·2013
Same author

Microsatellite markers for leatherside chubs Lepidomeda aliciae and Lepidomeda copei.

Molecular ecology resources·2011
Same author

Isolation and characterization of 16 microsatellite loci in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae).

Molecular ecology resources·2011
Same author

A locus-wide approach to assessing variation in the avian MHC: the B-locus of the wild turkey.

Heredity·2010
Same author

Clonal dynamics in western North American aspen (Populus tremuloides).

Molecular ecology·2009
Same author

Landscape-scale genetic variation in a forest outbreak species, the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae).

Molecular ecology·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
08:02

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

Morphological and genetic structuring in the Utah Lake sucker complex.

D D Cole1, K E Mock, B L Cardall

  • 1Department of Watershed Sciences and The Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-5210/5230, USA. dave.cole@aggiemail.usu.edu

Molecular Ecology
|December 11, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Hybridization between endangered June suckers and Utah suckers in Utah Lake creates intermediate forms. Genetic analysis reveals slight population structure despite significant morphological variation, complicating conservation efforts for these unique fish.

More Related Videos

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks
08:51

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Published on: May 13, 2016

Gamete Collection and In Vitro Fertilization of Astyanax mexicanus
10:52

Gamete Collection and In Vitro Fertilization of Astyanax mexicanus

Published on: May 25, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
08:02

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks
08:51

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Published on: May 13, 2016

Gamete Collection and In Vitro Fertilization of Astyanax mexicanus
10:52

Gamete Collection and In Vitro Fertilization of Astyanax mexicanus

Published on: May 25, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Conservation genetics
  • Ichthyology
  • Ecology

Background:

  • The federally endangered June sucker (Chasmistes liorus), endemic to Utah Lake, faces population decline partly due to hybridization with the Utah sucker (Catostomus ardens).
  • Suckers in Utah Lake display significant external morphological variation, with intermediate forms blurring species identification due to hybridization.
  • Differentiating between June and Utah suckers is challenging due to overlapping morphological traits, impacting conservation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the morphological and genetic variation within the Utah Lake sucker complex.
  • To compare morphological analyses with genetic data (amplified fragment length polymorphism and microsatellite analyses).
  • To inform conservation strategies for the endangered June sucker and the Utah sucker complex.

Main Methods:

  • Morphological analysis focused on mouth characters differentiating feeding strategies (planktivory in June suckers, benthivory in Utah suckers).
  • Genetic variation assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and microsatellite markers.
  • Bayesian model-based genetic clustering was employed to detect population structure.

Main Results:

  • No deep genetic divergence was found between June and Utah sucker morphs.
  • Significant, though slight, population structuring was observed alongside substantial morphological variation.
  • Bayesian clustering identified two sucker populations, but these did not strongly align with morphological groups or marker systems.

Conclusions:

  • The Utah Lake sucker complex exhibits considerable morphological variation with limited genetic structuring, posing a conservation dilemma.
  • Conservation decisions must weigh focusing on the endangered June sucker morphotype versus conserving the broader morphotypic variation for evolutionary potential.
  • Understanding the interplay of morphology and genetics is crucial for effective management of this unique fish complex.