Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Published on: January 7, 2019

Online resource for validation of brain segmentation methods.

David W Shattuck¹, Gautam Prasad, Mubeena Mirza

¹Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive South, NRB1, Suite 225, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. shattuck@loni.ucla.edu

|December 17, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Genetic studies of quantitative MCI and AD phenotypes in ADNI: Progress, opportunities, and plans.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2015

Same author

Development of the human fetal hippocampal formation during early second trimester.

NeuroImage·2015

Same author

2014 Update of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of papers published since its inception.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2015

Same author

Sharing data in the global alzheimer's association interactive network.

NeuroImage·2015

Same author

Imaging in StrokeNet: Realizing the Potential of Big Data.

Stroke·2015

Same author

The Image and Data Archive at the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging.

NeuroImage·2015

Accurate brain segmentation is crucial for neuroimaging analysis. A new web resource standardizes skull-stripping evaluation, showing three popular algorithms perform well with proper parameter tuning.

Area of Science:

Neuroimaging
Medical Image Analysis
Computational Neuroscience

Background:

Accurate image segmentation is essential for developing and applying neuroimaging analysis tools.
Current evaluation methodologies for segmentation algorithms lack standardization, hindering direct comparison of results.
Standardized evaluation is needed for assessing skull-stripping algorithm performance in T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a standardized web-based resource for evaluating skull-stripping algorithm performance in T1-weighted MRI.
To provide a platform for researchers to objectively assess and compare different skull-stripping methods.
To facilitate reproducible and reliable validation of neuroimaging segmentation tools.

Main Methods:

More Related Videos

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

Manual Segmentation of the Human Choroid Plexus Using Brain MRI

Manual Segmentation of the Human Choroid Plexus Using Brain MRI

Published on: December 15, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Published on: January 7, 2019

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

Manual Segmentation of the Human Choroid Plexus Using Brain MRI

Manual Segmentation of the Human Choroid Plexus Using Brain MRI

Published on: December 15, 2023

Developed a web-based resource offering a test dataset and an online validation application for skull-stripping.

Users upload their segmentation results to the server for automated metric computation and reporting.

The framework was applied to evaluate three popular skull-stripping algorithms: Brain Extraction Tool, Hybrid Watershed Algorithm, and Brain Surface Extractor.

Main Results:

The web resource successfully computed a series of metrics and generated detailed validation reports for uploaded segmentation results.
Evaluation of three popular skull-stripping algorithms demonstrated that all can achieve satisfactory performance.
Satisfactory skull-stripping was achieved across all tested algorithms when appropriate program settings and parameter selection were employed.

Conclusions:

The developed web-based resource provides a standardized framework for evaluating skull-stripping performance in T1-weighted MRI.
Proper parameter selection is critical for optimizing the performance of existing skull-stripping algorithms.
This resource will aid researchers in selecting and applying appropriate algorithms for their neuroimaging analysis needs.