Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Knee Joint01:23

Knee Joint

The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...
Ankle Joint01:10

Ankle Joint

The ankle is formed by the talocrural joint (crural = leg). It consists of the articulations between the talus bone of the foot and the distal ends of the tibia and fibula of the leg. The superior aspect of the talus bone is square-shaped and has three areas of articulation. The top of the talus articulates with the inferior tibia. This is the portion of the ankle joint that carries the body weight between the leg and foot. The sides of the talus are firmly held in position by the articulations...
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints01:16

Structural Joints: Synovial Joints

Synovial joints are the most common type of joint in the body. A key structural characteristic for a synovial joint is the presence of a joint cavity. This fluid-filled space is where the articulating surfaces of the bones contact each other. Also, unlike fibrous or cartilaginous joints, the articulating bone surfaces at a synovial joint are not directly connected to each other with fibrous connective tissue or cartilage. This gives the bones of a synovial joint the ability to move smoothly...
Development of the Limb Synovial Joints01:07

Development of the Limb Synovial Joints

Joints form during embryonic development in conjunction with the formation and growth of the associated bones. The embryonic tissue that gives rise to all bones, cartilage, and connective tissues of the body is called mesenchyme.
The mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into chondrocytes that form the hyaline cartilage, and later the cartilaginous model of the bone. This model further transforms into a bone. This process is known as endochondral ossification.
During development, the limbs...
Bones of the Upper Limb: Radius01:09

Bones of the Upper Limb: Radius

The radius is longer of the two bones that make up the human antebrachium or forearm. At the proximal end, the radius articulates with the capitulum of the humerus and the radial notch of the ulna to form the elbow joint. At the distal end, the radius articulates with the ulna via the ulnar notch, forming the distal radioulnar joint. Distally, the radius also attaches to the carpal wrist bones (scaphoid and lunate) to form the radiocarpal joint.
The radius has a nail-shaped head, and a short...
Degenerative Disc Disease I: Introduction01:27

Degenerative Disc Disease I: Introduction

Degenerative disc disease is a chronic condition in which intervertebral discs gradually lose structure and function. It is not infectious or autoimmune; rather, it results from age-related biochemical and mechanical changes, influenced by genetic, metabolic, and environmental factors.Structure and Function of DiscsThe spine contains 23 intervertebral discs that absorb load, distribute forces, maintain spacing, and allow flexibility. Each disc consists of a nucleus pulposus, a gel-like core...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing domain match and feasibility of candidate instruments matching with OMERACT endorsed domains to measure flare in knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2024
Same author

General Order in Reference to Sanitary Precautions: General Order-No 5.

The Chicago medical journal·2023
Same author

Methodical control of the difficult pediatric airway: two case reports.

Journal of medical case reports·2023
Same author

Proposed study designs for approval based on a surrogate endpoint and a post-marketing confirmatory study under FDA's accelerated approval regulations for disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2018
Same author

Percutaneous gastric tube placement: Comparison of trans-abdominal and trans-oral approach in patients with chronic ascites.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2018
Same author

Radial subluxation in relation to hand strength and radiographic severity in trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
06:45

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy

Published on: November 28, 2025

Location specific radiographic joint space width for osteoarthritis progression.

G Neumann1, D Hunter, M Nevitt

  • 1Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
|December 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Computerized joint space width (JSW) measurements show promise for assessing knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression, particularly in more diseased knees. These location-specific measures may enhance the power of clinical studies evaluating knee OA.

More Related Videos

Standardized Histomorphometric Evaluation of Osteoarthritis in a Surgical Mouse Model
07:32

Standardized Histomorphometric Evaluation of Osteoarthritis in a Surgical Mouse Model

Published on: May 6, 2020

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis
06:28

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis

Published on: September 2, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
06:45

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy

Published on: November 28, 2025

Standardized Histomorphometric Evaluation of Osteoarthritis in a Surgical Mouse Model
07:32

Standardized Histomorphometric Evaluation of Osteoarthritis in a Surgical Mouse Model

Published on: May 6, 2020

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis
06:28

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis

Published on: September 2, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Osteoarthritis Research
  • Medical Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Assessing medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression relies on radiographic joint space width (JSW) measurements.
  • Current methods may lack sensitivity in detecting subtle changes, particularly in early-stage disease.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of location-specific computer-aided JSW measurements against minimum JSW (mJSW) for medial compartment knee OA assessment.
  • To identify the most responsive joint location for measuring medial compartment JSW in knee OA.

Main Methods:

  • Serial bilateral posterior-anterior radiographs from 118 knee OA patients (Health, Aging and Body Composition Study) were analyzed.
  • Semi-automated software measured JSW at seven fixed locations and mJSW, with human verification.
  • Standardized response mean (SRM) quantified the responsiveness of JSW measures over 36 months.

Main Results:

  • Location-specific JSW (SRM=0.46) demonstrated slightly better overall responsiveness than mJSW (SRM=0.42).
  • For mild OA (Kellgren-Lawrence score ≤1), mJSW (SRM=0.40) outperformed location-specific measures (SRM=0.30).
  • In moderate to severe OA (KL score 2-3), location-specific JSW (SRM=0.74) was significantly more responsive than mJSW (SRM=0.49), with better performance in central joint areas.

Conclusions:

  • Computerized, location-specific JSW measurements are feasible and offer a potentially superior method for assessing radiographic knee OA, especially in more advanced disease.
  • This approach may increase the statistical power of clinical trials using fixed-flexion radiography protocols for knee OA.