Proposed study designs for approval based on a surrogate endpoint and a post-marketing confirmatory study under FDA's

V B Kraus1, L S Simon2, J N Katz3

  • 1Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Insights

The Food and Drug Administration

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Science
  • Clinical Research
  • Regulatory Affairs

Background:

  • The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) established accelerated approval regulations in 1992.
  • These regulations permit approval of drugs for serious conditions based on surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoints.
  • Osteoarthritis (OA) is defined as a serious condition, expanding opportunities for biomarker use in drug approval.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To brainstorm and propose suitable trial designs for post-marketing approval (PMA) of OA drugs.
  • To address the unmet medical need in osteoarthritis treatment.
  • To refine PMA trial designs in consultation with regulatory agencies.

Main Methods:

  • The white paper defines accelerated approval concepts and regulations.
  • It proposes two major study design scenarios for PMA trials in OA.
  • Discussion and refinement of these designs are planned with regulatory agencies.

Main Results:

  • The paper outlines the regulatory framework for accelerated approval, particularly for OA.
  • Two distinct study design scenarios for post-marketing approval trials are presented.
  • The focus is on confirming drug effects on clinically relevant outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Accelerated approval offers a pathway for drugs treating serious conditions like OA.
  • Well-defined post-marketing approval trial designs are crucial for confirming efficacy.
  • Collaboration with regulatory agencies is key to facilitating OA drug development.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs01:26

FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs

Post-approval, manufacturers may modify an approved new or generic drug product. Such modifications can encompass alterations in the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API), manufacturing process, formulation, batch size, manufacturing site, and container closure system (FDA Guidance for Industry, April 2004). Often, a drug product may undergo multiple changes.These modifications require careful evaluation to determine their potential impact on the drug product's identity, strength, quality,...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).