Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with data...
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian adaptive randomization in the I-SPY2 sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

mHealth adherence in pediatric epilepsy: Outcomes of a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART).

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Independent Increments and Group Sequential Tests.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Adaptive randomization methods for sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (smarts) via thompson sampling.

Biometrics·2024
Same author

A generalized logrank-type test for comparison of treatment regimes in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.

Biometrics·2024
Same author

The eACT study design and methods: A sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial of A novel adherence intervention for youth with epilepsy.

Contemporary clinical trials·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Semiparametric Estimation of Treatment Effect in a Pretest-Posttest Study with Missing Data.

Marie Davidian1, Anastasios A Tsiatis, Selene Leon

  • 1Marie Davidian and Anastasios A. Tsiatis are Professors, Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8203, USA (e-mail: davidian@stat.ncsu.edu ; tsiatis@stat.ncsu.edu ). Selene Leon is Senior Biostatistician, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936-1080, USA (e-mail: selene.leon@pharma.novartis.com ).

Statistical Science : a Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics
|December 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a semiparametric approach for pretest-posttest designs, addressing missing data to improve treatment effect estimation. The method offers a unified framework for valid statistical inference in clinical trials.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Pretest-posttest designs are widely used in research, measuring outcomes before and after an intervention.
  • Missing posttest data is common and can compromise the validity of study findings.
  • A lack of consensus exists on appropriate analytical methods, especially when dealing with missing data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust statistical framework for analyzing pretest-posttest data, particularly when posttest responses are missing.
  • To apply the Robins, Rotnitzky, and Zhao theory to characterize consistent treatment effect estimators.
  • To identify the most efficient estimator within this class for improved statistical power.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a semiparametric perspective on the pretest-posttest model, making minimal distributional assumptions.
  • Applied the Robins, Rotnitzky, and Zhao theory to derive consistent estimators for treatment effects.
  • Demonstrated the practical application of these theoretical results in a familiar research context.

Main Results:

  • Characterized a class of consistent treatment effect estimators applicable to pretest-posttest studies with missing data.
  • Identified the most efficient estimator within this class, enhancing statistical power.
  • Provided a unified framework for inference, simplifying analysis in complex scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed semiparametric approach offers a valid and efficient method for analyzing pretest-posttest data, even with missing outcomes.
  • The Robins, Rotnitzky, and Zhao theory provides a powerful tool for developing robust statistical methods in this setting.
  • These findings are also applicable to comparing treatment means adjusted for baseline covariates.