Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences01:28

Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences

Social behavior is a complex phenomenon that arises from the interaction between biological predispositions and environmental influences. This intricate interplay shapes how individuals think, feel, and act in various social contexts. Understanding these mechanisms requires insights from psychology, neuroscience, genetics, and evolutionary theory.Environmental Influences on Social BehaviorEnvironmental factors, including temperature, odors, and visual stimuli, play a crucial role in shaping...
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals01:30

Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals

The actions and characteristics of others heavily influence the causes of social behaviors. Emotional expressions serve as powerful social signals, shaping behaviors and interactions in significant ways. Whether through direct observation or subconscious processing, individuals constantly adjust their responses based on the emotions and attributes of those around them.Emotional Cues and Social ResponsesFacial expressions, tone of voice, and body language provide crucial emotional cues that...
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality01:19

The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

Behaviorists view personality as primarily shaped by environmental reinforcements and consequences. According to this perspective, behavior is influenced by external stimuli, and individuals adjust their actions based on rewards and punishments. Over time, learning histories — accumulated patterns of reinforcement — play a significant role in shaping personality. Behaviors that lead to positive outcomes are reinforced, while those resulting in negative outcomes are diminished. Radical...
Behaviorism01:28

Behaviorism

The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Twiddling Bits.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same author

Agency.

The Journal of general psychology·2024
Same author

Hyperbolae.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2024
Same author

From data through discount rates to the area under the curve.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2023
Same author

Theory of reinforcement schedules.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2023
Same author

Discounting and the portfolio of desires.

Psychological review·2023
Same journal

Facing ambiguity: What we do in the space between stimulus and response.

Current directions in psychological science·2026
Same journal

Escaping the Jingle-Jangle Jungle: Increasing Conceptual Clarity in Psychology Using Large Language Models.

Current directions in psychological science·2026
Same journal

Emotional Acculturation: Emotions as a Pathway to Social Integration.

Current directions in psychological science·2026
Same journal

Historical Change in Midlife Development from a Cross-National Perspective.

Current directions in psychological science·2026
Same journal

Embodied and Embedded Learning: Child, Caregiver, and Context.

Current directions in psychological science·2026
Same journal

A Framework for Automation in Psychotherapy.

Current directions in psychological science·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

The Four Causes of Behavior.

Peter R Killeen1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.

Current Directions in Psychological Science
|December 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Aristotle's framework for understanding phenomena, including causes and functions, is applied to conditioning. This approach helps resolve the computation versus association debate by analyzing information processing constraints.

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding phenomena requires identifying origin, structure, substrate, and function.
  • Aristotle's four causes (efficient, formal, material, final) offer a framework for explanation.
  • The computation versus association debate in conditioning lacks a unifying explanatory model.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply Aristotle's framework of causes to the study of conditioning.
  • To analyze the computation-versus-association debate using formal models.
  • To investigate the role of information reduction timing in conditioning.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Aristotle's four causes (efficient, formal, material, final) as an analytical lens.
  • Applying automata theory to model conditioning and information processing.
  • Examining empirical evidence related to early versus late information reduction.

Main Results:

  • Aristotle's framework provides a structured approach to analyzing conditioning mechanisms.
  • Automata theory offers a formal grammar to represent models of conditioning.
  • The timing of information reduction to disposition is identified as a critical empirical issue.

Conclusions:

  • Aristotle's framework can effectively bridge philosophical explanation and scientific inquiry in conditioning.
  • Formal models derived from automata theory can represent computational constraints in conditioning.
  • This integrated approach offers new perspectives on the computation-versus-association debate.