Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026
06:09
Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
Published on: March 12, 2021
Type II error in the shoulder and elbow literature
1Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
|December 20, 2008
Summary
Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in shoulder and elbow surgery often lack sufficient statistical power. This means studies concluding no difference between treatments may be incorrect due to a high risk of Type II error.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for intervention comparison in medicine.
- Negative results in RCTs (failing to show a difference) may stem from insufficient statistical power, leading to Type II errors.
- Type II errors occur when a study incorrectly concludes no difference exists between interventions when a true difference is present.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the statistical power of published RCTs in shoulder and elbow surgery literature.
- To determine if these studies have adequate power to minimize Type II errors and accurately conclude no difference between interventions.
- To assess the reliability of negative findings in orthopedic RCTs.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of Medline for RCTs with negative results published between 1994 and 2007.
- Inclusion criteria focused on RCTs related to shoulder and elbow injury care.
- Analysis of eligible studies to calculate statistical power and assess the risk of Type II error.
Main Results:
- The analyzed RCTs demonstrated an average statistical power of only 41% to detect a true difference between interventions.
- This falls significantly short of the commonly accepted standard of 80% power.
- A 41% power indicates a substantial risk of Type II error in studies reporting no significant difference.
Conclusions:
- Published RCTs in shoulder and elbow literature frequently exhibit inadequate statistical power.
- This limits the ability to confidently conclude no difference exists between interventions based on negative findings.
- It is crucial to distinguish between observing no difference and confirming the absence of a true difference, highlighting the impact of Type II error.
Related Concept Videos
01:14Errors In Hypothesis Tests
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
01:13Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
01:23Muscles of the Shoulder
The muscles surrounding the shoulder girdle, including the clavicle and scapula, primarily stabilize the scapula. This stable base allows other muscles to move the humerus effectively. Scapular movements often mirror those of the humerus and extend its range of motion. For instance, raising the arm above the head would not be feasible without simultaneous upward rotation of the scapula.
Anterior Thoracic Muscles
The anterior thoracic muscles include the serratus anterior, subclavius, and...
Anterior Thoracic Muscles
The anterior thoracic muscles include the serratus anterior, subclavius, and...
01:19Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus
The upper limb consists of the arm, forearm, wrist, and hand bones. The humerus is the single bone of the upper arm region. Proximally, it has a large, spherical, smooth head that articulates with the glenoid cavity of the scapula to form the glenohumeral or shoulder joint. The margin of the head is the anatomical neck, a residual epiphyseal plate. Laterally it extends to form bony projections called the greater tubercle and the lesser tubercle. Next to the tubercles is the surgical neck, a...