Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
[Bacterial infections in palliative care: antibiotics and therapeutic limitations]
Nicolas Béziaud1, Patricia Pavese, Didier Barnoud
1Equipe mobile de soins palliatifs et de coordination en soins de support, CHU de Grenoble, F-38043 Grenoble Cedex 09, France. NBeziaud@chu-grenoble.fr
Abstract:
The benefits of antibiotics treatments are not obvious at the end of life except for the symptomatic urinary infections. The numerous antibiotics prescribed raise economic and ecological problems in terms of bacterial resistances development and also in terms of quality of life. The control of symptoms has to be the main indication to prescribe antibiotics at the end of life. It is the general state, the prognostic of the patient, his wishes and those of his family, and his symptoms, controlled or not, that direct the decision to prescribe an antibiotic. Physicians must consider the objective of antibiotic treatment, the risk of side effects and the constraints related to this treatment before prescribing it for terminally ill people. They have to respect the bioethical principles, primarily the principles of beneficence, non-maleficience, and the respect to autonomy of the patient. In the event of decision of an antibiotic treatment at a patient at the end of the lifetime, the choice of this one must answer obviously the same requirements as in the other medical situations, within the framework of comprehensive and rigorous process.
Insights
Antibiotic benefits at end-of-life are limited, mainly for urinary infections. Symptom control, patient wishes, and ethical principles should guide antibiotic prescribing decisions for terminally ill patients.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Infectious Diseases
- Palliative Care
Context:
- Antibiotic use in terminally ill patients presents complex challenges.
- Prescribing antibiotics at the end of life often offers limited benefits beyond symptomatic urinary tract infections.
- Widespread antibiotic use contributes to antibiotic resistance and negatively impacts patient quality of life.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of antibiotic treatment in end-of-life care.
- To emphasize symptom control as the primary indication for antibiotic prescription in palliative settings.
- To outline the ethical considerations and decision-making process for prescribing antibiotics to terminally ill patients.
Summary:
- Antibiotic treatment benefits are minimal at the end of life, except for symptomatic urinary infections.
- Prescribing decisions must integrate the patient's overall condition, prognosis, wishes, family input, and symptom management.
- Physicians must weigh treatment objectives, side effect risks, and patient constraints, adhering to bioethical principles like beneficence, non-maleficence, and patient autonomy.
Impact:
- Promotes judicious antibiotic stewardship in palliative care.
- Enhances patient-centered decision-making at the end of life.
- Reduces the economic and ecological burden of unnecessary antibiotic use and combats antimicrobial resistance.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Microbiota Modulation by Antibiotics
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
