Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 7 T in the Rat Barrel Cortex During Whisker Activation
09:26

Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 7 T in the Rat Barrel Cortex During Whisker Activation

Published on: February 8, 2019

Reducing the number of reader interpretations in MRMC studies.

Nancy A Obuchowski1

  • 1Department of Quantitative Health Sciences/Wb4, and the Imaging Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. obuchon@ccf.org

Academic Radiology
|January 7, 2009
PubMed
Summary

A new "mixed" multireader, multicase (MRMC) study design significantly reduces reader interpretations. This approach offers substantial time savings for large-scale diagnostic accuracy studies, though it requires more truth-verified cases.

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing Study Design and Analysis of MR Imaging Markers Through Measurement Error Modeling.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same author

Scalable Clinical Annotation with Location Evidence (SCALE).

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Association of Statistical Methodology and Design in Preclinical Animal Studies With Successful Translation Into Clinical Phase 2 Trials.

Neurology·2025
Same author

Objective Task-Based Evaluation of Quantitative Medical Imaging Methods: Emerging Frameworks and Future Directions.

PET clinics·2025
Same author

Understanding Repeatability and Reproducibility Coefficients for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers.

Radiology·2025
Same author

ISIT-GEN: An in silico imaging trial to assess the inter-scanner generalizability of CTLESS for myocardial perfusion SPECT on defect-detection task.

ArXiv·2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging analysis
  • Statistical study design

Background:

  • Multireader, multicase (MRMC) receiver-operating characteristic studies are vital for diagnostic accuracy assessment.
  • Traditional MRMC designs often necessitate extensive patient numbers, readers, and interpretations, leading to high resource demands.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a novel "mixed" MRMC study design aimed at reducing the total number of reader interpretations.
  • To compare the efficiency and resource requirements of the mixed MRMC design against traditional approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical and empirical evaluation of the mixed MRMC design.
  • Comparison of reader interpretations and truth-verified cases with traditional MRMC designs across varying correlation values and sample sizes.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 7 T in the Rat Barrel Cortex During Whisker Activation
09:26

Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 7 T in the Rat Barrel Cortex During Whisker Activation

Published on: February 8, 2019

Main Results:

  • The mixed MRMC design substantially decreases reader interpretations in large studies when between-reader correlations differ.
  • For instance, a mixed design with 20 readers and 200 cases requires 132 interpretations per reader, versus a traditional design, but adds 64 truth-verified cases.

Conclusions:

  • The mixed MRMC design offers a trade-off: fewer reader interpretations and shorter study duration for an increased number of truth-verified cases.
  • This design is particularly advantageous for studies involving non-rare conditions where gold standard assessments are routine.