Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Leadership and regressive group processes: a pilot study
Marie G Rudden1, Stuart Twemlow, Steven Ackerman
1mgrudden@gmail.com
Abstract:
Various perspectives on leadership within the psychoanalytic, organizational and sociobiological literature are reviewed, with particular attention to research studies in these areas. Hypotheses are offered about what makes an effective leader: her ability to structure tasks well in order to avoid destructive regressions, to make constructive use of the omnipresent regressive energies in group life, and to redirect regressions when they occur. Systematic qualitative observations of three videotaped sessions each from N = 18 medical staff work groups at an urban medical center are discussed, as is the utility of a scale, the Leadership and Group Regressions Scale (LGRS), that attempts to operationalize the hypotheses. Analyzing the tapes qualitatively, it was noteworthy that at times (in N = 6 groups), the nominal leader of the group did not prove to be the actual, working leader. Quantitatively, a significant correlation was seen between leaders' LGRS scores and the group's satisfactory completion of their quantitative goals (p = 0.007) and ability to sustain the goals (p = 0.04), when the score of the person who met criteria for group leadership was used.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Impact of Groups on Individuals
Impact of Groups on Groups
Robbers Cave
Deindividuation
Social Proof
