Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Safe Framework for Quantitative In Vivo Human Evaluation of Image Guidance.

IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology·2024
Same author

Assessment of Orbital Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging Biomarkers in Patients with Thyroid Eye Disease.

Journal of digital imaging·2019
Same author

Toward computer-assisted image-guided congenital heart defect repair: an initial phantom analysis.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2016
Same author

A novel method for texture-mapping conoscopic surfaces for minimally invasive image-guided kidney surgery.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2016
Same author

Toward real-time remote processing of laparoscopic video.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2015
Same author

Robust optic nerve segmentation on clinically acquired computed tomography.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2015
Same journal

Categorization and segmentation of intestinal content frames for wireless capsule endoscopy.

IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2013
Same journal

An intelligent scoring system and its application to cardiac arrest prediction.

IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2013
Same journal

Guest editorial: Multimedia services and technologies for e-health (MUST-EH).

IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2013
Same journal

Editorial: From “information technology in biomedicine” to “biomedical and health informatics”.

IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2013
Same journal

Equipment location in hospitals using RFID-based positioning system.

IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2013
Same journal

Distributed system for cognitive stimulation over interactive TV.

IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2012
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

Determining the presence of bias error using statistical methods.

David M Kwartowitz1, Robert L Galloway, Richard G Shiavi

  • 1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA. kwartowitz.david@mayo.edu

IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine : a Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
|January 9, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical analysis can detect bias errors in surgical localizers, improving accuracy. This method is crucial for characterizing localizer performance and ensuring reliable image-guided surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging
  • Surgical navigation
  • Metrology

Background:

  • Image-guided surgery relies on localizers for spatial positioning.
  • Localizer measurements are susceptible to intrinsic errors, affecting accuracy.
  • Existing error assessment methods often assume isotropic and unbiased measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the presence and impact of bias errors in localizer measurements.
  • To introduce statistical techniques for characterizing localizer performance.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of localizers based on bias error detection.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical analysis of points localized on a rigid phantom.
  • Examination of orientation dependence in measurement errors.
  • Characterization of a series of localizers using statistical techniques.

Main Results:

  • Bias errors introduce orientation dependence to measured point inaccuracies.
  • Statistical methods can effectively detect the presence of bias errors.
  • Characterization of localizers provides insights into their performance and efficacy.

Conclusions:

  • Detecting bias errors is vital for accurate localizer performance characterization.
  • Statistical analysis offers a robust method for identifying localizer inaccuracies.
  • Understanding localizer bias is essential for improving the reliability of image-guided surgery.