Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
Published on: October 12, 2012
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT): clinical and economic outcomes
Steven Baroletti1, Chiara Piovella, John Fanikos
1Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. sbaroletti@partners.org
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse drug reaction that occurs following exposure to unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). HIT with thrombosis (HITT) can cause devastating venous thromboembolism or arterial clots, prolonged hospitalization, and increased costs. To explore the economic and clinical implications of HIT and HITT, we initiated a single-center patient registry. In this report, we describe patient characteristics, comorbidities, management strategies, clinical outcomes, and costs. We enrolled 349 hospitalized patients with an enzyme immunoassay-confirmed diagnosis of HIT over a 40-month period. Patients were assessed for the primary outcome of 30-day mortality, as well as baseline characteristics, development of thrombosis, and the economic impact of HIT. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality and occurred in 58 (16.6%) patients, 40 (15.3%) in the HIT group versus 18 (20.7%) in the HITT group (p = 0.25). The frequency of HIT was greater in patients exposed to UFH than in patients exposed to LMWH (0.8% vs. 0.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Both HIT and HITT patients who were exposed to UFH had higher hospital costs than those exposed to LMWH ($113,100 vs. $56,352, respectively, p < 0.001). HIT remains an important clinical problem with a high mortality rate and significant cost, regardless of development of thrombosis. Prospective controlled trials need to be conducted to determine the optimal strategy to reduce the frequency of HIT.
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse drug reaction that occurs following exposure to unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). HIT with thrombosis (HITT) can cause devastating venous thromboembolism or arterial clots, prolonged hospitalization, and increased costs. To explore the economic and clinical implications of HIT and HITT, we initiated a single-center patient registry. In this report, we describe patient characteristics, comorbidities, management strategies, clinical outcomes, and costs. We enrolled 349 hospitalized patients with an enzyme immunoassay-confirmed diagnosis of HIT over a 40-month period. Patients were assessed for the primary outcome of 30-day mortality, as well as baseline characteristics, development of thrombosis, and the economic impact of HIT. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality and occurred in 58 (16.6%) patients, 40 (15.3%) in the HIT group versus 18 (20.7%) in the HITT group (p = 0.25). The frequency of HIT was greater in patients exposed to UFH than in patients exposed to LMWH (0.8% vs. 0.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Both HIT and HITT patients who were exposed to UFH had higher hospital costs than those exposed to LMWH ($113,100 vs. $56,352, respectively, p < 0.001). HIT remains an important clinical problem with a high mortality rate and significant cost, regardless of development of thrombosis. Prospective controlled trials need to be conducted to determine the optimal strategy to reduce the frequency of HIT.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Therapeutic Index
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions