Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
Current trends in coronary revascularization
Shannon M Dunlay1, Charanjit S Rihal, Thoralf M Sundt
1Véronique L. Roger, MD, MPH Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. roger.veronique@mayo.edu.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use has risen, while coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has declined, with historical disparities narrowing. The ongoing debate on PCI versus CABG appropriateness continues amid evolving factors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary revascularization options expanded with bare-metal and drug-eluting stents.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use increased, while coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) decreased.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze trends in PCI versus CABG utilization.
- To examine factors influencing the choice between PCI and CABG.
- To assess the narrowing of historical disparities in revascularization procedures.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of trends in coronary revascularization procedures.
- Review of factors influencing procedural choices and utilization.
- Examination of demographic trends in patients undergoing revascularization.
Main Results:
- PCI rates have increased, whereas CABG rates have decreased.
- Historical disparities in revascularization use among women, elderly, and nonwhite patients appear to be narrowing.
- The optimal choice between PCI and CABG remains debated, influenced by patient anatomy, function, and comorbidities.
Conclusions:
- The trend of increased PCI use over CABG may continue, but is subject to multiple influencing factors.
- Ongoing evaluation of clinical evidence, technology, guidelines, and reimbursement is necessary.
- The debate on PCI versus CABG appropriateness persists in clinical practice.
Abstract:
The options for coronary revascularization broadened in recent years with the introduction of bare-metal stents in the 1990s and drug-eluting stents in 2003. Since then, the rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have increased whereas the use of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has decreased. Although historically there have been disparities in the use of revascularization procedures in women, the elderly, and nonwhite patients, there is some evidence to suggest these gaps have narrowed in recent years. In any given clinical circumstance, there is ongoing debate as to whether PCI or CABG is the more appropriate revascularization method depending on coronary anatomy, ventricular function, and associated conditions. Also, trends in coronary revascularization are potentially influenced by emerging clinical evidence and new technologies, national guidelines and appropriateness criteria, procedure reimbursement, and changes in the population being treated. Accordingly, it is unclear whether the trend in increased use of PCI versus CABG will continue.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
