Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026
06:28
Leveraging Turbidity and Thromboelastography for Complementary Clot Characterization
Published on: June 4, 2020
The TEG vs the ROTEM thromboelastography/thromboelastometry systems
G N B Jackson1, K J Ashpole, S M Yentis
1Magill Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care & Pain Management, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
Anaesthesia
|January 16, 2009
Summary
The TEG thromboelastograph and ROTEM thromboelastometer are point-of-care blood coagulation devices. While sharing features, they differ in complexity, ease of use, and cost.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Hematology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Point-of-care testing is crucial for rapid clinical decisions.
- Accurate blood coagulation monitoring is vital in surgical and critical care settings.
- Thromboelastography offers a comprehensive assessment of hemostasis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the TEG thromboelastograph and ROTEM thromboelastometer.
- To compare ease of use, complexity, and cost between the two devices.
- To gather user feedback from clinical specialists.
Main Methods:
- A one-week comparative evaluation of TEG and ROTEM devices.
- Training of consultant and trainee anaesthetists and a haematologist by manufacturers.
- System setup, calibration, and usage by trained personnel.
- Data collection via questionnaires on user experience and technical support.
Main Results:
- Both TEG and ROTEM are point-of-care blood coagulation monitoring systems.
- Devices exhibit differences in operational complexity and user-friendliness.
- Variations exist in the initial purchase and ongoing running costs between TEG and ROTEM.
Conclusions:
- TEG and ROTEM are comparable point-of-care coagulation devices with distinct usability profiles.
- Cost-effectiveness and specific clinical workflow needs should guide device selection.
- Further investigation into long-term performance and support is warranted.
