Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

06:45
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Anticipatory pursuit is influenced by a concurrent timing task.
Jeremy B Badler1, Philippe Lefèvre, Marcus Missal
1Laboratory of Neurophysiology (NEFY), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. jeremy.badler@uclouvain.be
Journal of Vision
|January 23, 2009
Summary
Predicting events relies on timing, but attention significantly impacts this. This study shows that dividing attention between visual tracking and a manual timing task delays event prediction, suggesting a shared attentional resource.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychology
- Oculomotor Research
Background:
- Accurate prediction of upcoming events is crucial for compensating sensory-motor delays.
- Temporal prediction relies on internal timing mechanisms, which are known to be modulated by attention.
- Understanding how attention influences temporal processing is key to explaining predictive behaviors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of attention in the temporal processing component of event prediction.
- To examine how concurrent tasks affect the timing accuracy of visual smooth pursuit.
- To explore the relationship between oculomotor and manual timing responses under dual-task conditions.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a visual smooth pursuit task, tracking a moving target after a fixed delay.
- A concurrent manual response task required participants to estimate target motion onset by button press.
- The onset of anticipatory pursuit eye movements served as a measure of temporal estimation accuracy.
Main Results:
- Anticipatory pursuit onset times were significantly delayed when the smooth pursuit task was performed concurrently with the manual task, compared to when performed in isolation.
- A significant correlation was observed between the latencies of oculomotor (pursuit) and manual responses.
- These findings indicate that attentional load impacts temporal processing in predictive tasks.
Conclusions:
- The results support a centralized attentional gating mechanism within Scalar Timing Theory.
- Attentional resources are allocated dynamically between different tasks, affecting temporal prediction accuracy.
- Dividing attention between smooth pursuit preparation and a parallel timing task impairs the precision of internal time estimation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Parallel Processing
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

