Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
Introspection01:29

Introspection

Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Socially responsible science: Exploring the complexities.

European journal for philosophy of science·2025
Same author

Acceptability and Barriers to Chronic Pain Treatment in Refugee Torture Survivors.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Research integrity in Spain: Great expectations, mediocre results.

Accountability in research·2025
Same author

Leaving Against Medical Advice: What's a Nurse to Do?

The American journal of nursing·2025
Same author

Gene Editing, Genetic Selection, and Reasons That Matter.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024
Same author

Biobanking Legislation in Spain: Advancing or Undermining Its Ethical Values?

Biopreservation and biobanking·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

Creating reflective spaces: interactions between philosophers and biomedical scientists.

Inmaculada de Melo-Martín1

  • 1Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, 411 E. 69th Street, NewYork, NY 10021, USA. imd2001@med.cornell.edu

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
|January 27, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores how collaborations between philosophers and biomedical scientists can address ethical and social concerns to improve health. It highlights the benefits of interdisciplinary approaches for public health and quality of life.

More Related Videos

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments
07:46

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Published on: April 30, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments
07:46

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Published on: April 30, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Medicine
  • Biomedical Ethics
  • Social Science in Health

Background:

  • Science policy increasingly promotes interdisciplinary collaboration.
  • Social scientists and humanists offer broader perspectives often missed by natural scientists and engineers.
  • Integrating diverse expertise is crucial for addressing complex health challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine collaborations between philosophers and biomedical scientists.
  • To explore how these collaborations address ethical, social, and environmental concerns in healthcare.
  • To identify pathways for improving public health and quality of life through interdisciplinary work.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing interdisciplinary initiatives.
  • Case study analysis of philosophical and biomedical collaborations.
  • Discussion of ethical frameworks and their application in biomedical research.

Main Results:

  • Philosophical input can enrich biomedical research by addressing ethical implications.
  • Interdisciplinary dialogue can lead to more holistic approaches to health and well-being.
  • Collaborations can proactively identify and mitigate social and environmental impacts of medical advancements.

Conclusions:

  • Interdisciplinary collaborations, particularly between philosophy and biomedicine, are vital for navigating complex health issues.
  • Addressing ethical, social, and environmental factors is key to enhancing health outcomes and quality of life.
  • Overcoming challenges in such collaborations is essential for realizing their full potential.