Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
Published on: August 4, 2023
Socially responsible science: Exploring the complexities
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín1, Kristen Intemann2
1Weill Cornell Medical College-Cornell University, Division of Medical Ethics, New York, NY, USA.
Defining socially responsible science is complex. This paper argues that narrow, explicit definitions are more effective for transforming research practices than broad, vague calls for social responsibility in science.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy of Science
- Science and Values
- Social Responsibility in Science
Background:
- Philosophers of science frequently discuss the necessity of social responsibility in scientific endeavors.
- The precise meaning and implementation of socially responsible science remain unclear and debated.
- Existing discussions often lack concrete dimensions for practical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review philosophical contributions to the discourse on socially responsible science.
- To identify and explore the key dimensions required for a robust understanding of socially responsible science.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches to defining and implementing social responsibility in science.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of philosophical works on science and values.
- Analysis of arguments concerning the definition and scope of socially responsible science.
- Conceptual exploration of the dimensions necessary for a functional account.
Main Results:
- A comprehensive account of socially responsible science is challenging to formulate.
- Broad calls for social responsibility in science are insufficient for driving institutional change.
- Current frameworks often fail to address the specific dimensions needed for meaningful transformation.
Conclusions:
- Narrower, more explicit definitions of socially responsible science are more conducive to substantive change.
- Vague calls for social responsibility risk obscuring the path to practical implementation.
- Future efforts should focus on developing precise and actionable frameworks for responsible scientific conduct.
Related Concept Videos
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Ethics in Research
Defining Social Psychology
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences
Ethics and Bioethics
Impact of Social Context on Individuals

