Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Outcome measures used in forensic mental health research: a structured review
Jemma C Chambers1, Jenny Yiend, Barbara Barrett
1Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, UK.
Background:
The evidence base for forensic mental health (FMH) services has been developing since the late 1990s. Are outcome measures sound enough for the evaluation tasks?
Aims:
To identify, from published literature, outcome measures used in FMH research and, where feasible, assess their quality.
Method:
A structured review was undertaken of trials and intervention studies published between 1990 and 2006. Details of outcome variables and measures were abstracted. Evidence regarding most frequently occurring outcome measures was assessed.
Results:
Four hundred and fifty different instruments were used to assess outcomes, incorporating 1038 distinct variables. Very little evidence could be found to support the measurement properties of commonly used instruments.
Conclusions:
and implications for practice There is little consistency in the use of outcome measure in FMH research. Effort is required to reach consensus on validated outcome measures in this field in order to better inform practice.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Self-Report Tests of Personality
01:29Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
01:30Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...