Parental perception of time and decision-making in neonatal research

K S Hoehn1, A Nathan, L E White

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60608, USA. sarah1220@comcast.net

Insights

Providing parents adequate time to decide improves research participation for neonates with congenital heart disease. Parents were satisfied with decisions, even with time constraints, highlighting the need to optimize the consent process.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal research ethics
  • Pediatric cardiology
  • Clinical trial recruitment

Background:

  • Parental consent is crucial for neonatal research participation.
  • Congenital heart disease (CHD) necessitates complex research decisions for neonates.
  • Time constraints can impact parental decision-making in research settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate how the time available for decision-making affects parental consent for neonatal research.
  • To identify factors influencing parental decisions regarding research participation for infants with CHD.

Main Methods:

  • Interviews with 37 parents of 19 neonates with CHD eligible for genetic, heart rate variability (HRV), or MRI studies.
  • Parents were asked about decision-making time adequacy and reasons.
  • Statistical analysis (Fisher's exact tests) and qualitative thematic analysis were employed.

Main Results:

  • Parents reporting adequate time were more likely to consent to participation (genetics P<0.01, HRV P=0.05, MRI P<0.01).
  • Inadequate time was linked to insufficient time for informed choice (n=10), logistical concerns (n=8), absent spouse (n=7), and limited discussion time (n=4).

Conclusions:

  • Parental perception of sufficient decision time positively correlates with research enrollment willingness.
  • Parents reported satisfaction with their decisions regardless of time constraints.
  • Optimizing the parental permission process time can enhance neonatal research participation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
The Nativist Approach01:21

The Nativist Approach

The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to exist...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism01:24

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism

In pediatric care, understanding the nuances of hepatic drug metabolism is crucial, as it significantly differs from that of adults. This divergence is primarily due to the developmental stage of drug-metabolizing enzymes, which affects how medications are processed in the body. In neonates, for instance, the activity of Phase I enzymes—critical for the initial breakdown of drugs—is markedly reduced, functioning at just 20–40% of the levels seen in adults. This reduction poses a challenge in...