[Anterior scoliosis surgery. State of the art and a comparison with posterior techniques]

For more than 2 decades ventral derotation spondylodesis (Zielke VDS) as a major improvement over Dwyer instrumentation (DI) was the gold standard of instrumented curve correction and stabilization from the anterior approach. As the first available system it enables a true three-dimensional curve correction. A disadvantage is the low internal stabilization capability with a need for long-term external stabilization by means of cast and brace treatment postoperatively. Meanwhile with the development of modern single and dual solid rod systems these disadvantages can be avoided completely. Video-assisted (thoracoscopic) anterior scoliosis surgery accounts for less than 2% of anteriorly treated scoliosis cases, mainly due to a long operating time and significant learning curve.From the posterior approach the Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation (CDI) as a polysegmentally attached posterior hook threaded dual rod system used to be state of the art for a long time, since it eliminated the disadvantages of Harrington instrumentation (HI) in terms of only one-dimensional correction and low stabilization capabilities. However even with CDI effective derotation was impossible. In posterior scoliosis surgery there is a strong trend away from hook systems towards transpedicular segmentally fixed dual rod systems not only in the lumbar spine but also in the thoracic area. Advantages of these newer techniques are shorter fusion, improved correction, and less loss of correction over time.Advantages of modern anterior instrumentation systems in comparison to posterior transpedicular instrumented dual rod systems are less blood loss, better derotation, slightly shorter fusion levels, and a better influence on sagittal plane control or improvement especially for hypokyphotic thoracic scoliosis cases. Our data also document a superior spontaneous correction of the lumbar curve after selective anterior instrumented correction (Lenke 1B+C), although other studies could not find significant differences. In our experience the neurological risk of anterior instrumented correction is also lower than that of posterior scoliosis surgery, although the morbidity and mortality data of the Scoliosis Research Society could not prove that anymore in recent years. A negative effect of anterior transthoracic scoliosis surgery in comparison to posterior surgery is a more negative effect on lung function, which improves slower after surgery and does not quite reach the levels of posterior surgery at follow-up. But new data on posterior segmental transpedicular correction and fusion also prove a lordosating effect with negative effect on lung function.