Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

06:59
Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture Evaluation in an Osteoporosis Mouse Model
Published on: September 8, 2023
Experimental bone biopsies using two bone biopsy needles: quantitative micro-CT analysis of bone specimens.
Eun-Ah Park1, Sung Hwan Hong, Kwang Gi Kim
1Department of Radiology, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 110-744, Korea.
Academic Radiology
|February 10, 2009
Summary
A 2.4-mm trephine provides sufficient bone samples for quantitative analysis of metabolic bone disease using micro-CT imaging. A 1.8-mm trephine is less suitable for evaluating bone structure parameters.
Area of Science:
- Bone research
- Medical imaging
- Osteoporosis diagnostics
Background:
- Accurate quantitative evaluation of metabolic bone disease is crucial for diagnosis and treatment.
- Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) enables detailed 3D analysis of bone microarchitecture.
- Assessing the adequacy of small biopsy samples is essential for reliable micro-CT analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if bone samples from 2.4-mm and 1.8-mm trephines are sufficient for quantitative analysis of metabolic bone disease using micro-CT.
- To compare the accuracy of quantitative parameters derived from different trephine sizes against baseline vertebral data.
Main Methods:
- 19 porcine lumbar vertebrae underwent micro-CT imaging before and after biopsy with 2.4-mm and 1.8-mm trephines.
- Seven 3D structural parameters (trabecular bone volume, number, thickness, separation, structure model index, degree of anisotropy, bone pattern factor) were measured using CtAn software.
- Paired t tests and Bland-Altman analysis assessed differences and agreement between biopsy samples and baseline specimens.
Main Results:
- The 2.4-mm trephine samples showed no significant differences from baseline for trabecular bone volume, thickness, and number.
- The 1.8-mm trephine samples showed no significant difference from baseline only for trabecular thickness.
- Significant differences were observed for other parameters when using the 1.8-mm trephine compared to baseline.
Conclusions:
- Bone samples obtained with a 2.4-mm trephine are acceptable for quantitative evaluation of trabecular bone volume, thickness, and number.
- The 2.4-mm trephine is superior to the 1.8-mm trephine for quantitative analysis of bone structure using micro-CT.
- These findings support the use of 2.4-mm trephine biopsies for reliable metabolic bone disease assessment.

