Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with X-rays, and by 1900, X-ray was widely...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Image quality standards in digital mammography: A consensus statement.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
Same author

Expression patterns of H3K27me3 for differentiation of breast fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumors.

APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica·2024
Same author

Task-based selection of three-dimensional rotational angiography imaging modes using in-house phantom.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2024
Same author

Task-based detectability in anatomical background in digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic mammography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2024
Same author

Investigation of test methods for QC in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: II. Artefacts/uniformity, exposure time and phantom-based dosimetry.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023
Same author

Investigation of test methods for QC in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: I. Iodine signal testing.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023
Same journal

Stafne Bone Cavity.

JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR)·2018
Same journal

Mounier-Kuhn Syndrome.

JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR)·2018
Same journal

Calcific Tendinitis of the Longus Colli Muscle.

JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR)·2018
Same journal

Bronchial Atresia.

JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR)·2018
Same journal

Food Impaction in a 9-Year-Old Boy.

JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR)·2018
Same journal

Traumatic Intrapericardial Diaphragmatic Herniation.

JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR)·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Artifacts in digital mammography.

C Van Ongeval1, J Jacobs, H Bosmans

  • 1Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. vanongeval@uz.kuleuven.ac.be

JBR-BTR : Organe De La Societe Royale Belge De Radiologie (SRBR) = Orgaan Van De Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging Voor Radiologie (KBVR)
|February 11, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Digital mammography screening in Belgium implemented rigorous quality control. Artifact detection is crucial for accurate interpretation, categorizing issues from technologists to equipment failures.

More Related Videos

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Digital mammography screening was implemented in Flanders, Belgium in April 2005.
  • A strict physical-technical Quality Control (QC) procedure, based on European guidelines (EUREF), was established.
  • Quality assurance (QA) includes artifact detection, vital for accurate interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To categorize and analyze artifacts encountered in digital mammography.
  • To understand the physical-technical origins of these artifacts.
  • To emphasize the importance of artifact recognition in digital breast imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Continuous evaluation of digital mammography image quality during central second reading.
  • Registration and categorization of all visible artifacts into five groups: patient, technologist, mammography unit, processing, and viewing conditions.
  • Daily QC involving phantom image exposure for all systems.

Main Results:

  • Artifacts were categorized, with patient-related artifacts being comparable to film-screen mammography.
  • Key technologist-related artifacts include dust in computed radiography (CR) cassettes.
  • Mammography unit artifacts differed between CR (reader-origin) and direct radiography (DR) systems (detector-origin, e.g., Selenium detector failures).
  • Processing artifacts arose from system or PACS software misinterpretations.
  • Viewing condition artifacts were minimized due to daily monitor QC.

Conclusions:

  • Recognizing and understanding the physical-technical background of artifacts is essential to prevent misinterpretation in digital breast imaging.
  • Artifacts can mimic breast lesions or obscure image details.
  • Continuous quality control and assurance are fundamental for reliable digital mammography outcomes.