The hedgehog and the Borg: common morality in bioethics

Area of Science:

• Bioethics
• Moral Philosophy

Background:

• The role of common morality in bioethical reflection is debated.
• Beauchamp and Childress advocate for common morality over abstract ethical theories.
• Gert presents a comprehensive system of common morality.

Purpose of the Study:

• To critically evaluate the conceptions of common morality proposed by Gert and Beauchamp-Childress.
• To assess the utility of common morality in advancing bioethical discourse.
• To identify limitations in Gert's system, particularly regarding duties of assistance.

Main Methods:

• Critical commentary and philosophical analysis.
• Engagement with existing literature on common morality.
• Evaluation of arguments presented by Gert and Beauchamp-Childress.

Main Results:

• Endorses the shift towards common morality but questions its universalization.
• Identifies significant weaknesses and potential biases in Gert's conception of common morality.
• Critiques Gert's narrow view on duties of assistance as insufficient for alleviating suffering.

Conclusions:

• While common morality offers a valuable foundation for bioethics, its interpretation requires careful scrutiny.
• Gert's framework for common morality contains controversial and inadequate elements.
• Further refinement is needed to ensure moral frameworks effectively address global suffering.