Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calculation of Electric Flux01:25

Calculation of Electric Flux

Consider the electric field of an oppositely charged, parallel-plate system and an imaginary box between those plates. Let the bottom face of the box be ABCD, and the top face be FGHK. The electric field between the plates is uniform and points from the positive plate toward the negative plate. The calculation of this field's flux through the box's various faces shows that the net flux through the box is zero. Why does the flux cancel out here?
Calculation of First Law Quantities I01:25

Calculation of First Law Quantities I

Thermodynamic systems undergoing phase transitions or temperature changes experience energy transfer in the form of heat (q) and work (w). For a reversible phase change at constant temperature (T) and pressure (p), the process involves no chemical reaction but results in energy exchange between distinct phases.The heat transferred during this process corresponds to the latent heat of transition, which is the amount of heat energy absorbed or released by a substance when it changes from one...
Calculation of First-Law Quantities II01:24

Calculation of First-Law Quantities II

The first law of thermodynamics establishes that the change in internal energy of a system is given by ΔU = q + w, where q is the heat exchanged, and w is the work performed. For a perfect gas, both internal energy (U) and enthalpy (H) depend solely on temperature. Consequently, for any change of state, whether reversible or irreversible, the internal energy change is determined by integrating the heat capacity at constant volume, and the enthalpy change by integrating the heat capacity at...
Series Impedances: Three-Phase Line01:27

Series Impedances: Three-Phase Line

Calculating series impedances for a three-phase overhead line involves evaluating resistances and inductive reactances in a network with three-phase and multiple neutral conductors grounded at regular intervals.
Using Kirchhoff's laws, an integro-differential equation for the network is derived. This equation accounts for unbalanced phase currents, which may induce return currents through neutral wires and the earth, seeking the least impedance path. Earth return conductors can replace the...
Trigonometric Identities III01:27

Trigonometric Identities III

Cofunction identities are a key concept in trigonometry. They describe how trigonometric functions relate when their input angles are complementary — meaning the angles add up to 90°. On the unit circle, every angle θ— measured counterclockwise from the positive x-axis — corresponds to a point with coordinates (cos⁡ θ, sin ⁡θ). These values represent the horizontal and vertical components of the terminal side of the angle.If the same point on the unit circle is instead described using the...
Ostwald’s Dilution Law01:25

Ostwald’s Dilution Law

Consider a binary electrolyte AB with a concentration ‘c’ that reversibly dissociates into its constituent ions. The degree of this dissociation is represented by ⍺. This means that the equilibrium concentration of each ionic species can be expressed as ⍺c. As well as this, the fraction of the electrolyte that remains undissociated at equilibrium is given by (1−⍺). The corresponding equilibrium concentration for this undissociated portion is then calculated as (1−⍺)c. For such solutions,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unsupervised quality monitoring of metal additive manufacturing using Bayesian adaptive resonance.

Heliyon·2024
Same author

Contribution of Rare and Potentially Functionally Relevant Sequence Variants in Schizophrenia Risk-Locus Xq28,distal.

American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics·2024
Same author

Non-invasive fetal monitoring: Fetal Heart Rate multimodal estimation from abdominal electrocardiography and phonocardiography.

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction·2022
Same author

Femoral fracture during breech vaginal delivery: A case report.

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction·2022
Same author

[Introduction of the Couder manoeuvre and perineal injuries].

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie·2021
Same author

[Giant condyloma acuminatum in pregnancy].

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

[Comparison between ray-tracing and IOL calculation formulae of the 3rd generation].

P-R Preussner1, P Hoffmann, K Petermeier

  • 1Universitätsaugenklinik Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz. pr.preussner@uni-mainz.de

Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde
|February 12, 2009
PubMed
Summary

For normal eyes, standard intraocular lens (IOL) calculation methods perform similarly. However, for eyes with extreme axial lengths, ray-tracing offers superior accuracy compared to traditional formulae.

More Related Videos

Recombination Dynamics in Thin-film Photovoltaic Materials via Time-resolved Microwave Conductivity
11:30

Recombination Dynamics in Thin-film Photovoltaic Materials via Time-resolved Microwave Conductivity

Published on: March 6, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

Recombination Dynamics in Thin-film Photovoltaic Materials via Time-resolved Microwave Conductivity
11:30

Recombination Dynamics in Thin-film Photovoltaic Materials via Time-resolved Microwave Conductivity

Published on: March 6, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Optical Metrology

Background:

  • Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is crucial for achieving optimal visual outcomes after cataract surgery.
  • Traditional IOL calculation methods rely on standard biometric parameters like axial length and corneal curvature.
  • The performance of these methods may vary in eyes with atypical axial lengths, such as very short or very long eyes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the prediction errors of various established IOL calculation methods.
  • To evaluate these methods in a large cohort of eyes, including those with extreme axial lengths.
  • To assess the suitability of different calculation approaches for non-standard ocular dimensions.

Main Methods:

  • Compared prediction errors of Haigis, SRK/T, Hoffer-Q, and Holladay formulae against OKULIX ray-tracing.
  • Utilized a dataset of 2888 normal eyes implanted with 8 different IOL models.
  • Adjusted methods for zero mean prediction error and evaluated performance in short, long, and extremely short eyes.

Main Results:

  • In normal eyes, all five methods demonstrated comparable standard deviations and absolute prediction errors.
  • Prediction error differences increased significantly with deviations from normal axial lengths, reaching up to 6D in extremely short eyes.
  • Ray-tracing showed potential for improved accuracy in non-normal eyes compared to traditional formulae.

Conclusions:

  • For normal eyes, the choice of IOL calculation method is less critical when using only axial length and corneal radii.
  • Ray-tracing offers an advantage for non-normal eyes (extremely short or long) by avoiding method-induced bias.
  • Advanced data like corneal topography can be integrated with ray-tracing for enhanced accuracy, particularly in post-refractive surgery eyes.