Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Traditional Trail Making Test Modified into Brand-new Assessment Tools: Digital and Walking Trail Making Test
Published on: November 23, 2019
Test-retest reliability of the Twin Cities Walking Survey
Ann Forsyth1, J Michael Oakes, Kathryn H Schmitz
1Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Background:
The Twin Cities Walking Study measured the associations of built environment versus socioeconomic and psychosocial variables with total physical activity and walking for 716 adults.
Methods:
This article reports on the test-retest reliability of the survey portion of the study. To test the reliability of the study measures, 158 respondents completed measures twice within 1 to 4 weeks. Agreement between participants' responses was measured using Pearson r and Spearman rho, and kappa statistics.
Results:
Demographic questions are highly reliable (R>.8). Questions about environmental and social features are typically less reliable (rho range=0.42-0.91). Reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (last 7 days version) was low (rho=0.15 for total activity).
Conclusions:
Much of the survey has acceptable-to-good reliability. The low test-retest reliability points to potential limitations of using a single administration of the IPAQ to characterize habitual physical activity. Implications for sound inference are accordingly complicated.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Self-Report Tests of Personality
McNemar's Test
Reliability and Validity
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

