Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

NMR 15N Relaxation Experiments for the Investigation of Picosecond to Nanoseconds Structural Dynamics of Proteins
Published on: November 1, 2024
Electron spin relaxation rates for semiquinones between 25 and 295K in glass-forming solvents
Velavan Kathirvelu1, Hideo Sato, Sandra S Eaton
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Denver, 2101 East Wesley Avenue, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
Abstract:
Electron spin lattice relaxation rates for five semiquinones (2,5-di-t-butyl-1,4-benzosemiquinone, 2,5-di-t-amyl-1,4-benzosemiquinone, 2,5-di-phenyl-1,4-benzosemiquinone, 2,6-di-t-butyl-1,4-benzosemiquinone, tetrahydroxy-1,4-benzosemiquione) were studied by long-pulse saturation recovery EPR in 1:4 glycerol:ethanol, 1:1 glycerol:ethanol, and triethanolamine between 25 and 295K. Although the dominant process changes with temperature, relaxation rates vary smoothly with temperature, even near the glass transition temperatures, and could be modeled as the sum of contributions that have the temperature dependence that is predicted for the direct, Raman, local mode and tumbling-dependent processes. At 85K, which is in a temperature range where the Raman process dominates, relaxation rates along the g(xx) (g approximately 2.006) and g(yy) (g approximately 2.005) axes are about 2.7-1.5 times faster than along the g(zz) axis (g=2.0023). In highly viscous triethanolamine, contributions from tumbling-dependent processes are negligible. At temperatures above 100K relaxation rates in triethanolamine are unchanged between X-band (9.5GHz) and Q-band (34GHz), so the process that dominates in this temperature interval was assigned as a local mode rather than a thermally activated process. Because the largest proton hyperfine couplings are only 2.2G, spin rotation makes a larger contribution than tumbling-dependent modulation of hyperfine anisotropy. Since g anisotropy is small, tumbling-dependent modulation of g anisotropy makes a smaller contribution than spin rotation at X-band. Although there was negligible impact of methyl rotation on T(1), rotation of t-butyl or t-amyl methyl groups enhances spin echo dephasing between 85 and 150K.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Nuclei: Types of Nuclear Relaxation
In spin–lattice or longitudinal relaxation, the excited spins exchange energy with the surrounding lattice as they return to the lower energy level. Among several mechanisms that contribute to spin–lattice relaxation, magnetic dipolar interactions are significant. Here, the excited nucleus transfers energy to a nearby...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
¹H NMR of Conformationally Flexible Molecules: Temporal Resolution
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy: Organic Radicals

