Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...

Somatosensation

Somatosensation

The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the stimulus...

Tactile and Chemical Senses

Tactile and Chemical Senses

Tactile senses encompass touch, temperature, and pain, each mediated by specific receptors. Touch receptors detect mechanical energy or pressure against the skin. Sensory fibers from these receptors enter the spinal cord and relay information to the brain stem. Here, most fibers cross over to the opposite side of the brain. The touch information then moves to the thalamus, which projects a map of the body's surface onto the somatosensory areas of the parietal lobes in the cerebral cortex. This...

Introduction to Special Senses

Introduction to Special Senses

Sensory receptors play an integral part in comprehending our external and internal environments. They receive diverse stimuli, converting them into the nervous system's electrochemical signals. This conversion occurs as the stimulus alters the sensory neuron's cell membrane potential, instigating the generation of an action potential. This action potential is subsequently transmitted to the central nervous system (CNS), which integrates with other sensory data or higher cognitive functions.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same author

Oncologic outcomes after declining lung cancer surgery: mixed methods analysis of a prospective pilot cohort.

Journal of thoracic disease·2026

Same author

Delivering tactile stimuli via mobile browsers: A method for remote multisensory research.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

The role of audiovisual object features and scene context on children's ability to categorise familiar objects.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026

Same author

Investigating developmental changes in susceptibility to temporal audiovisual illusions on balance and sensorimotor function in children.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Visual and tactile motion cues enhance the categorisation of novel object shapes.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026

Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026

Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026

Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026

Same journal

The frustration of a small <i>n</i>.

Perception·2026

Same journal

Why do we have two eyes.

Perception·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Canonical views in haptic object perception.

Andrew T Woods¹, Allison Moore, Fiona N Newell

¹School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.

|February 21, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Canonical views, specific object orientations, enhance tactile recognition. These tactile views, though consistent across individuals, differ from visual canonical views, suggesting functional equivalence between visual and tactile object recognition systems.

More Related Videos

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Haptic Perception

Background:

Visual object recognition benefits from specific "canonical" views that maximize object information.
Haptic object recognition, or recognition by touch, is efficient but whether it also relies on canonical views is largely unknown.
This is surprising as tactile exploration readily accesses object features.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the existence and impact of canonical views in haptic object recognition.
To determine if specific viewpoints enhance tactile object learning and recognition.
To compare haptic canonical views with those established in visual perception.

Main Methods:

Two experiments were conducted involving participants recognizing objects by touch alone.
Experiment 1: Participants identified optimal viewpoints for learning objects through touch.
Experiment 2: Recognition performance was compared using consistent (canonical) versus random object views.

Main Results:

A high degree of consistency in preferred viewpoints for tactile exploration was observed across participants.
These identified "canonical" haptic views significantly improved object recognition performance compared to random views.
Haptic canonical views did not always align with the canonical views identified in visual recognition.

Conclusions:

Canonical views exist in haptic object recognition, influencing recognition efficiency.
The findings suggest that tactile and visual systems may share functionally equivalent object representation mechanisms.
This supports a unified model of object recognition across different sensory modalities.