Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

08:34
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Dosimetric effect of prostate motion during helical tomotherapy
Katja M Langen1, Weiguo Lu, Twyla R Willoughby
1Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, FL 32806, USA. katja.langen@orhs.org
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|February 24, 2009
Summary
Intrafraction prostate motion during helical tomotherapy generally has a small dosimetric effect on target dose (D95%). While individual fractions may show significant dose reductions, the cumulative effect over treatment is minimal, especially with fractionation.
Area of Science:
- Radiation oncology
- Medical physics
Background:
- Prostate cancer radiotherapy requires precise dose delivery.
- Intrafraction motion can potentially compromise treatment accuracy.
- Helical tomotherapy is an advanced radiation delivery technique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of intrafraction prostate motion on dose distributions in helical tomotherapy plans.
- To quantify the dosimetric consequences of prostate motion on target coverage.
Main Methods:
- Real-time prostate motion was tracked using an electromagnetic device in 515 fractions from 16 patients.
- Dose distributions were recalculated retrospectively using a 4D calculation engine based on motion data.
- Key dosimetric parameters, including D(95%), were analyzed for individual fractions and cumulative treatment effects.
Main Results:
- The average change in target D(95%) across all fractions was less than 1%.
- Individual fractions occasionally showed D(95%) reductions up to 20%.
- The cumulative dosimetric effect on target D(95%) remained small, approximately 1% after five fractions.
Conclusions:
- Intrafraction prostate motion typically has a minor dosimetric impact on helical tomotherapy plans.
- Severe dose degradations in single fractions are infrequent and their cumulative effect is mitigated by fractionation.

