Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Nursing Diagnosis01:22

Nursing Diagnosis

Following assessment, a nursing diagnosis is the next step in the nursing process. It begins after the nurse has collected and recorded the patient data. The purpose of diagnosing is to identify how the client responds to actual or potential health processes, identify factors that bestow or that cause health problems, the etiologies, and identify resources or strengths the individual, group, or community can draw on to prevent or resolve problems.
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of Iodophor vs Chlorhexidine Solutions for Surgical Site Infections and Unplanned Reoperations for Patients Who Underwent Fracture Repair: The PREP-IT Master Protocol.

JAMA network open·2020
Same author

A Survey for End-Stage Ankle Arthritis Treatment: Ankle Arthrodesis Versus Ankle Arthroplasty.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2020
Same author

Posterior-Based Approaches to Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2020
Same author

Can the FEAR Index Be Used to Predict Microinstability in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopic Surgery?

The American journal of sports medicine·2019
Same author

Intra-articular Injections in the Treatment of Symptoms from Ankle Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

Foot & ankle international·2018
Same author

Diagnostic Accuracy of 3 Physical Examination Tests in the Assessment of Hip Microinstability.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2017

Related Experiment Videos

Making decisions about prognosis in evidence-based practice.

Ryan M Degen1, Daniel J Hoppe, Bradley A Petrisor

  • 1Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 2100 Main Street W, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Hand Clinics
|February 24, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study outlines how to appraise prognostic studies, which investigate factors impacting disease outcomes. Proper appraisal helps physicians apply study results to patient care and clinical decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Medical Statistics

Background:

  • Prognostic studies identify factors influencing disease outcomes.
  • These factors include patient characteristics, disease state, and symptom severity.
  • Study results can guide treatment for similar patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an unbiased appraisal framework for prognostic studies.
  • To enable physicians to assess the applicability of study findings.
  • To aid clinical decision-making in patient care.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of prognostic study methodologies.
  • Development of critical appraisal checklists.
  • Guidance on assessing study bias and generalizability.

Main Results:

  • A structured approach to evaluating prognostic research.
  • Identification of key elements for unbiased appraisal.
  • Emphasis on assessing the relevance of findings to individual patients.

Conclusions:

  • Unbiased appraisal of prognostic studies is crucial for effective clinical practice.
  • Physicians can better utilize prognostic research with a systematic evaluation method.
  • This framework supports evidence-based decision-making for improved patient outcomes.