Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative analysis is the process of identifying elements, ions, or compounds in an unknown sample. It is the first and most fundamental type of analysis based on the hierarchy of analytical goals. This hierarchy is significant as it provides a structured approach to scientific research, with qualitative analysis serving as the initial step, providing essential information before moving on to quantitative or other forms of analysis.
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative Analysis

For solutions containing mixtures of different cations, the identity of each cation can be determined by qualitative analysis. This technique involves a series of selective precipitations with different chemical reagents, each reaction producing a characteristic precipitate for a specific group of cations. Metal ions within a group are further separated by varying the pH, heating the mixture to redissolve a precipitate, or adding other reagents to form complex ions.
For instance, group IV...

Data Validation

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Leadership Behaviors and Burnout in Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study in the Veterans Health Administration.

Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives·2026

Same author

Differentiating the importance of workplace barriers for ICU nurse well-being and patient safety using AHP and FAHP methods.

Applied ergonomics·2026

Same author

Are some therapists more effective when they deliver one type of therapy versus another?

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)·2026

Same author

Burnout Trends Among US Health Care Workers.

JAMA network open·2025

Same author

Learning from the best: A positive deviance approach to Veterans Health Administration leadership practices.

Psychological services·2025

Same author

Interpersonal problems as a predictor of treatment outcome in adult depression: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Clinical psychology review·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Creative consensus on interpretations of qualitative data: the Ward method.

Hugo Josef Schielke¹, Jonathan Louis Fishman, Katerine Osatuke

¹Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA. schielhj@muohio.edu

Psychotherapy Research : Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research

|February 24, 2009

Summary

The Ward method facilitates consensus building through iterative cycles of individual creative work and noncritical group meetings. This collaborative approach allows unique perspectives to converge organically, leading to shared understanding and project alignment.

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

Collaboration Science
Organizational Psychology

Background:

Effective consensus building is crucial for collaborative projects.
Traditional methods may not fully leverage diverse contributor perspectives.
The Ward method (1987) presents an alternative iterative approach.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe the Ward method for consensus building.
To highlight the strengths of this iterative collaboration technique.
To discuss challenges encountered when implementing the Ward method.

Main Methods:

The Ward method involves an iterative process of individual work and group meetings.
Collaborators orient to goals and engage in cycles of creation and sharing.
Meetings foster a noncritical atmosphere for idea exchange.

Main Results:

Consensus emerges through independent work as collaborators adapt each other's ideas.
The iterative nature allows for gradual convergence of diverse perspectives.
The article itself exemplifies the application of the Ward method.

Conclusions:

The Ward method promotes consideration of unique perspectives in consensus building.
Independent work is paradoxically key to achieving group consensus.
The method offers a structured yet flexible framework for collaboration.