Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026
06:09
An In Ovo Model for Testing Insulin-mimetic Compounds
Published on: April 23, 2018
Alternative methods: Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane and in vitro cytotoxicity - a complementary approach
M Boue-Grabot1, G Bernardin, S Chaumond
1Biogir S.A., Z.I. de Toctoucau, BP 4, 33611 Gazinet Cedex, France.
International Journal of Cosmetic Science
|February 28, 2009
Summary
This study compared the rabbit
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Toxicology
- Cosmetic Science
Background:
- Ocular irritation testing is crucial for cosmetic and toiletry safety.
- The traditional rabbit's eye Draize test (IOMA) raises ethical concerns.
- Alternative methods are needed to assess ocular irritation potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the ocular irritation potential of 107 cosmetics and toiletries.
- To evaluate the correlation of two alternative methods (CFIO and HET-CAM) with the Draize test.
- To determine the reliability of alternative methods in identifying irritant products.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the rabbit's eye Draize test (IOMA) as a reference.
- Employed a cytotoxicity in vitro method (CFIO).
- Applied the hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test (HET-CAM).
Main Results:
- Good correlation was observed between both alternative methods and the Draize test.
- HET-CAM showed 12 non-correlating results; CFIO showed 14.
- All clearly irritant products were accurately identified by both alternative methods.
Conclusions:
- Alternative methods (CFIO and HET-CAM) show promise for assessing ocular irritation.
- The risk of underestimating ocular irritation potential was avoided.
- Coupling CFIO and HET-CAM may offer a reliable alternative to animal testing for cosmetics and toiletries.
